You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
After splitting free rects, it needs to check for free rects contained in other rects and remove them. Currently it filters out rects that don't touch the newly placed rect, and then checks all the other rects after splitting against each other.
Instead of having a single new set, it might be better to have a separate set for each face of the placed rect, since free rects touching different faces can't contain each other?
Also, with a strict bottom-left placement, I'm not sure the rects touching the bottom and left faces can have any new redundant rects, so if that is true it might be able to skip those 2 sets completely?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
After splitting free rects, it needs to check for free rects contained in other rects and remove them. Currently it filters out rects that don't touch the newly placed rect, and then checks all the other rects after splitting against each other.
Instead of having a single
new
set, it might be better to have a separate set for each face of the placed rect, since free rects touching different faces can't contain each other?Also, with a strict bottom-left placement, I'm not sure the rects touching the bottom and left faces can have any new redundant rects, so if that is true it might be able to skip those 2 sets completely?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: