You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This will make it much much simpler to support many database backends. It also makes martialling the returned objects much more simple. We would have to play a bit with the default table creation depending on of the json type exists or not, but that shouldn't be too hard (full back to just a blob and stringify the json).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
True this would make it much nicer to maintain, especially if we expand out what we are storing in the DB a little.
My worry with an ORM is that I really like the simplicity of what we have now - I can manually inspect the schema with a DB browser like Postico, make a few changes directly, and know I'm not screwing anything up. Would we have the same level of robustness with SQLAlchemy? (I'm asking as I really don't know btw, not rhetorical!)
This will make it much much simpler to support many database backends. It also makes martialling the returned objects much more simple. We would have to play a bit with the default table creation depending on of the json type exists or not, but that shouldn't be too hard (full back to just a blob and stringify the json).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: