Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Freeze Atoms Positions During Optimization #306

Open
RiesBen opened this issue Jan 31, 2024 · 5 comments
Open

Freeze Atoms Positions During Optimization #306

RiesBen opened this issue Jan 31, 2024 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@RiesBen
Copy link

RiesBen commented Jan 31, 2024

Hi,
I'm a QM beginner, currently testing QUICK and I think it is a very cool piece of software!

However I have one question, is it possible to freeze atom positions during the optimizations with the current implementation?
I could not find this in your docs (https://quick-docs.readthedocs.io/en/23.8.0/hands-on-tutorials.html), but in DL-Find it should be possible (https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jp9028968).

What I would like to do, is for example defined here (would also be happy with position restraints :) ) : https://psicode.org/psi4manual/master/optking.html#constrained-optimizations

@mizu-bai
Copy link

mizu-bai commented Mar 7, 2024

I have developed a Python script for invoking QUICK from Gaussian (https://github.com/mizu-bai/Gauick), so that you can use QUICK to calculate the energy and gradients with the optimization algorithms provided by Gaussian. I think you can freeze the atoms in Gaussian file to perform a constrained optimization task.

@maaku
Copy link

maaku commented Aug 14, 2024

I have a need for this exact use case as well. Is there a way of doing this within QUICK? If not, can you give a pointer as to the part of the code which might need to be modified? I or someone on our team could take a stab at adding this feature, but we don't know our way around the codebase yet.

@Madu86
Copy link
Collaborator

Madu86 commented Aug 14, 2024

This feature is currently implemented in a branch that needs to be merged: #366. Feel free to give it a try and provide feedback.

@maaku
Copy link

maaku commented Aug 14, 2024

Thanks! We will test that branch and report back. It might be a few weeks or more as we're only in the pre-planning stages for this project.

@RiesBen
Copy link
Author

RiesBen commented Aug 15, 2024

Thx for implementing this feature :)

@agoetz agoetz added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants