Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Working with non-lifecycle nodes #90

Open
norro opened this issue Aug 12, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Working with non-lifecycle nodes #90

norro opened this issue Aug 12, 2021 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@norro
Copy link
Collaborator

norro commented Aug 12, 2021

When the system definition (SMH) contains non-lifecycle nodes, inference will most probably fail, because nodes woll not report any (of the specified) states / transitions used by the inference.

Two options are:

  1. Introduce DONT-CARE in the SMH specification for states or
  2. (more convenient and flexible), let the mode manager / inference check for all nodes whether they are lifecycle nodes or states/transitions need to be ignored. Check can be done with the get_service_names_and_types_by_node() method.

When working, a launch test with a system consisting of i) rclcpp nodes, ii) rclcpp lifecycle nodes, rcl nodes, and iv) rclpy nodes would be great.

@norro norro added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 12, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant