diff --git a/template.md b/template.md index ce860c1..09ed928 100644 --- a/template.md +++ b/template.md @@ -1,67 +1,66 @@ --- title: MSD Paper Template -author: Jane Smith +author: Andrey Sadovykh layout: page --- # Title: MSD Paper Example -author: Firstname Lastname, Affiliation (eg Jane Smith, Innopolis University) +*Author: Firstname Lastname, Affiliation (e.g., Jane Smith, Innopolis University) 👤* +*Year: 2024* -### Abstract +### Abstract 📝 -Short discription of the paper including list of your contributions. +Provide a concise description of your paper, including a summary of your key contributions and findings. The abstract should give readers a clear idea of what to expect from your paper. Aim for about **200-300 words**. -The maximum length should be arround 5000 - 6000 words, excluding bibliography. +*Note: The full paper should be approximately **5000-6000 words**, excluding the bibliography.* -## Introduction +## 1. Introduction 📖 -Introduce the subject. +Introduce the subject of your paper. Define the scope of your research and set the stage for the reader by explaining the context of the topic. -### Motivation +### 1.1 Motivation 💡 -Why the topic is important? Justify with numbers (if possible). +Explain why the chosen topic is important. Justify its significance with relevant data, statistics, or industry trends if possible. -### Pbm statement +### 1.2 Problem Statement ❓ -What problem your paper solves? +Define the problem your paper seeks to address. State your original contribution and how it adds value to the existing body of knowledge. -What is your original contribution. +## 2. Related Work 🔗 -## Related work +Review **5-10 relevant papers** that are important to your topic. Discuss their relevance, main findings, and limitations. Highlight how your work differentiates or builds upon these existing studies. -Introduce 5-10 relevant papers and discuss their relevance to the subject. +## 3. Discussion 💬 -## Discussion +Provide a thorough analysis and comparison of the reviewed literature. Use comparison tables, charts, or figures where relevant to enhance clarity. -Compare and summarize. Use comparison tables whenever relevant. +* Include any **original insights** or unique perspectives that you have developed. +* Discuss practical applications or implications for managing software development. -Any original insigts? +## 4. Conclusions 🏁 -## Conclusions +Summarize the main findings of your paper. Reiterate which aspects are your original contributions and insights. Conclude with a discussion on the importance and potential impact of your findings. -Summarize. -Discuss, what of the above your original ideas and insigts. -Add conclusions about importance of your findings. +## 5. References 📚 -## References - -Use IEEE format. +List all references using the **IEEE format**. Ensure that your bibliography includes **5-10 high-quality academic sources**. (Optional) -* make a public library in Zotero for this paper. -* provide a link to this Zotero library +* Create and link to a public Zotero library for this paper to provide easy access to your references. + +## 6. AI-Generated Content Disclaimers 🤖 -## AI-generated content disclaimers -The author declares that the his original ideas are in the core of the content of the article. +Authors must declare the extent to which AI tools were used in the preparation of their paper. This ensures transparency and academic integrity. -AI usage self-declaration: -* Translation \[yes\|no\] -* Spelling correction \[yes\|no\] -* Text styling \[yes\|no\] -* Summarization \[yes\|no\] -* Content extraction \[yes\|no\] -* Ideas generation \[yes\|no\] -* Other \[specify...\] +* The author affirms that the core ideas presented in the paper are original. +* AI usage self-declaration: + * Translation [yes|no] + * Spelling correction [yes|no] + * Text styling [yes|no] + * Summarization [yes|no] + * Content extraction [yes|no] + * Ideas generation [yes|no] + * Other [specify...] -## Reviewers comments +## 7. Reviewers' Comments ✍️ -We will provide the review to briefly discuss the quality of your paper and avert the audience. \ No newline at end of file +Feedback will be provided by reviewers, which will include a summary of the strengths and areas for improvement of your paper. This feedback aims to guide both the author and potential readers.