Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Blog fails to build with Racket 8.2 #287

Open
ulysses4ever opened this issue Oct 30, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

Blog fails to build with Racket 8.2 #287

ulysses4ever opened this issue Oct 30, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@ulysses4ever
Copy link
Collaborator

In an attempt to fix #286 I updated Racket and the blog failed after raco frog -b (you can just run make inside blog to repro) with:

  error: "raco install: packages installed, although setup reported errors"
  context...:
   /usr/share/racket/collects/racket/private/more-scheme.rkt:163:2: select-handler/no-breaks
   /usr/share/racket/pkgs/scribble-lib/scribble/eval.rkt:356:9
   .../private/map.rkt:40:19: loop
   [repeats 1 more time]
   body of "/home/ulysses/Temp/nuprl-website/blog/_src/posts/2016-07-11-tutorial-racket-ffi-part-3.scrbl"
   .../private/map.rkt:40:19: loop
   .../racket/cmdline.rkt:191:51
   body of "/usr/share/racket/pkgs/scribble-lib/scribble/run.rkt"
   /home/ulysses/.racket/8.2/pkgs/frog/frog/private/read-scribble.rkt:16:0
   /home/ulysses/.racket/8.2/pkgs/frog/frog/private/posts.rkt:43:2
   /usr/share/racket/collects/racket/contract/private/arrow-higher-order.rkt:375:33
   /home/ulysses/.racket/8.2/pkgs/frog/frog/private/main.rkt:205:2: on-file
   /usr/share/racket/collects/racket/file.rkt:681:2: do-path
   /usr/share/racket/collects/racket/file.rkt:695:2: do-paths
   /home/ulysses/.racket/8.2/pkgs/frog/frog/private/main.rkt:196:0: build
   /usr/share/racket/collects/racket/cmdline.rkt:479:10: call-handler
   ...

What is loop?

@LeifAndersen
Copy link
Member

I'll take a look at this tomorrow, but it looks like loop is just an internal function used by scribble-lib. Not sure why its erroring though.

@LeifAndersen
Copy link
Member

THis issue should be fixed now. (Although building with 7.9, but ya.)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants