Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NTR: Mass per unit area #31

Open
dr-shorthair opened this issue Jun 2, 2021 · 4 comments
Open

NTR: Mass per unit area #31

dr-shorthair opened this issue Jun 2, 2021 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
New term Propose addition of new term(s)

Comments

@dr-shorthair
Copy link

Required

Term name (PrefLabel)

Mass per unit area

Definition

Mass per unit area

Sources/references

eReefs

Optional

Synonym or acronym (AltLabel)

[Only use if the new term has known synonyms or acronyms]

Mapping to external terminologies

[Is your submission related to any existing terms in external resources: please enter one or a list of URIs]

ORCID

orcid.org/0000-0002-3884-3420

Additional information

Broader concept than http://vocab.nerc.ac.uk/collection/S06/current/S0600088/ and http://vocab.nerc.ac.uk/collection/S06/current/S0600086/

@dr-shorthair dr-shorthair added the New term Propose addition of new term(s) label Jun 2, 2021
@gwemon
Copy link
Contributor

gwemon commented Sep 13, 2021

@dr-shorthair It looks like I missed this ticket. Sorry. I guess this is mass of fresh material per unit area of the bed? And it is from model prediction/estimate? If this is the case then would it not be equivalent to wet weight biomass? Is this not the quantity that the model is trying to reproduce. Or do you see "Wet weight biomass" as being only applicable to physical samples? I can consult the OBIS vocab group to get their views on the matter.

@dr-shorthair
Copy link
Author

would it not be equivalent to wet weight biomass

It's been a while since I filed this, and I can't recall all my thinking. But I think my point was that the more general quantity-type or 'property' is missing from S06. Mass per unit area could apply to many things, not only biomass. But perhaps you don't do hierarchies in S06?

@gwemon
Copy link
Contributor

gwemon commented Sep 13, 2021

I have started using NAR/BRD relationships in the component vocabs of P01 to help discovery but only if we have to. I will look at your suggestion in the context of other measurements. The problem with broad terms in component vocabs is that they could be used to create a P01 that becomes so vague or ambiguous that it looses its usefulness as an interoperable variable description.

@dr-shorthair
Copy link
Author

It is mentioned in rows 21, 61, 62, 63 of the table in the eReefs spreadsheet.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
New term Propose addition of new term(s)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants