Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add 'Elevated urine biliverdin level HP:0025743' #63

Open
ImkeTammen opened this issue Jan 28, 2025 · 5 comments
Open

Add 'Elevated urine biliverdin level HP:0025743' #63

ImkeTammen opened this issue Jan 28, 2025 · 5 comments

Comments

@ImkeTammen
Copy link

Dear upheno2 team,

can 'Elevated urine biliverdin level HP:0025743' be added to upheno2? I was hoping to add this term to the clinical synopsis for an OMIA entry: https://www.omia.org/OMIA002917/9615/. The term exists in HPO but nou upheno2.

Kind regards,

Imke

@matentzn
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you @ImkeTammen

I can see the HP term in uPheno: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ols4/ontologies/upheno/classes/http%253A%252F%252Fpurl.obolibrary.org%252Fobo%252FHP_0025743

Do you mean to add a term with a uPheno id? I think you mean that, right, because you cant use HP ids (as they are human-specific) in OMIA.

@ImkeTammen
Copy link
Author

Dear Nico,

That is interesting - when I search the upheno2 Monarch look up for 'biliverdin' this entry does not come up - https://ols.monarchinitiative.org/search?q=biliverdin&groupField=iri&start=0&ontology=upheno2

And our look up in OMIA to pheno2 didn't find the term either?

If a upheno2 ID could be created that would be great but I have used some HPO terms at the moment in OMIA for the moment if I can't seem to find a good MPO or upheno2 term.

I have a student starting soon doing a small project on adding upheno2 terms to OMIA and if possible it might be a good time to discuss best approach based on current experiences ...

@matentzn
Copy link
Contributor

Oh yes the monarch OLS uPheno is way out of date - you should be using the "official OLS" now!

@ImkeTammen
Copy link
Author

Dear Nico - so just to clarify - we should use the https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ols4/ upheno search (as there is no upheno2) now?

@matentzn
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, please use https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ols4/ontologies/upheno from now on!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants