You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is meta-issue to collect as much as possible cases where we observe different sublist patterns in ConstructAllGroups outputs. I don't know a reason to doubt replication results, since this is certainly possible when randomised algorithms are being used, so my plan is to add such gnu(n) to the database and close corresponding issues/PRs, but add a link to them to this issue. Such cases may be good candidates for regression tests.
At the moment, we have observed:
gnu(9792)=73284 #70: 10 pairs of groups in GAP 4.8.3 vs 7 pairs of groups in the master branch for n=9792
gnu(7290)=3623 #82: no sublists in GAP 4.8.3 and one pair of groups in the master branch for n=7290
gnu(6804)=5981 #83: 11 pairs of groups in GAP 4.8.3, 8 pairs with GAP 4.8.4 and 10 pairs of groups in the master branch for n=6804
gnu(7360)=10743 #84: 3 pairs of groups in GAP 4.8.3 vs 4 pairs in GAP 4.8.4 and no sublists in the master branch for n=7360
gnu(6720)=106765 #99: no sublists in GAP 4.8.3 and 3 pairs of groups in the master branch for n=6720
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is meta-issue to collect as much as possible cases where we observe different sublist patterns in ConstructAllGroups outputs. I don't know a reason to doubt replication results, since this is certainly possible when randomised algorithms are being used, so my plan is to add such gnu(n) to the database and close corresponding issues/PRs, but add a link to them to this issue. Such cases may be good candidates for regression tests.
At the moment, we have observed:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: