Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

opwidget should be served as "utility" and not "service" #208

Open
alexboss opened this issue Nov 9, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

opwidget should be served as "utility" and not "service" #208

alexboss opened this issue Nov 9, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@alexboss
Copy link

alexboss commented Nov 9, 2022

Dear colleagues,

Alexandre from DIGIT WEBTOOLS.

We'd like to report an issue detected thanks to this issue: https://citnet.tech.ec.europa.eu/CITnet/jira/browse/WEBTOOLS-17694

Actually, the opwidget snippet should be generated with the property utility instead of service.

Ex:

{
  "utility": "opwidget",
  "widgetId": "6000"
}

Fundamentally, it still works with property service but it tries to load a file webtools.opwidget.css which does not exist. This is why it's better to switch to utility.

The documentation on Webtools wiki has been updated accordingly: https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/fpfis/wikis/display/webtools/OP+Widgets

Thank you and best regards.

Alexandre - DIGIT WEBTOOLS

@alexboss
Copy link
Author

FYI, Webtools changed the code on the Webtools side to prevent a 404 on webtools.opwidget.css however it's still advised to use utility instead of service. THank you and best regards. Alexandre - DIGIT WEBTOOLS

@brummbar brummbar added the bug Something isn't working label Mar 3, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants