[PRE REVIEW]: Django Remote Submission

[whedon]

Submitting author: @ricleal (Ricardo Miguel Ferraz Leal)
Repository: https://github.com/ornl-ndav/django-remote-submission
Version: v0.11.1
Editor: @arfon
Reviewer: @djmitche

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @ricleal. The JOSS editor (shown at the top of this issue) will work with you on this issue to find a reviewer for your submission before creating the main review issue.

@ricleal if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon. I'm here to help you with some common editorial tasks for JOSS.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

[arfon]

👋 thanks for your submission to JOSS. From a quick inspection of this submission it's not entirely obvious that it meets our submission criteria. In particular, this item:

• Your software should have a research application

Could you confirm here that there is a research application for this software (and explain what that application is)?

Many thanks!

[ricleal]

Arfon,

This software is part of our scientific pipeline.
It is used to submit asynchronously to a cluster (using ssh) python scripts. In our case, we have a user friendly web interface and all the complex fitting routines are submitted to this cluster. Once the fitting routine is finished the results are transparently sent back to the user.
Let me know if this is enough to clarify the research application of this software.
Thank you

[arfon]

Thanks @ricleal. Since you submitted this package we've expanded a little on the requirements for the paper.md file. Could you take a look at the updated guidelines and expand a little on what you have?

In the meantime, I'll look for a reviewer.

[arfon]

👋 @adrn - would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS?

[adrn]

Howdy! I'm not so familiar with Django, so I don't think I'd be a good fit – sorry!

[arfon]

@whedon list reviewers

[whedon]

Here's the current list of JOSS reviewers: https://bit.ly/joss-reviewers

[arfon]

👋 @djmitche - would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS?

[djmitche]

Yes, I will have a look.

[arfon]

@whedon assign @djmitche as reviewer

[arfon]

@whedon assign @arfon as editor

[whedon]

OK, the editor is @arfon

[arfon]

@whedon assign @djmitche as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, the reviewer is @djmitche

[arfon]

@whedon start review magic-word=bananas

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in #366. Feel free to close this issue now!

[arfon]

@djmitche please head over to #366 for the actual review will happen.