-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
/
Copy pathANL-7092.txt
3607 lines (2157 loc) · 111 KB
/
ANL-7092.txt
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
B boniagiis
TA ENERGY SYSTEMS LIBRARIES
T
GGG RHIDIC) S
st ENTHATHESEART
el o @I BRI S OB IO
e S Q[ BN = (S ) v ik i A ¥kl
M=)V R He)
T bt e i
ANL-7092
Reactof-Technology
(TID-4500, 46th Ed.)
AEC Research and
Development Report
ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY
9700 South Cass Avenue
Argonne, Illinois 60440
»y
CATALOG OF NUCLEAR REACTOR CONCEPTS
Part 1. Homogeneous and Quasi-homogeneous Reactors
Section III. Reactors Fueled with Molten-
salt Solutions
by
Charles E. Teeter, James A. Lecky,
and John H. Martens
*,
Technical Publications Department
September 1965
— —
-
MARIETTA ENERGY SYSTEMS LIBRARIES
comraes T sa0eengss IDHATHANA
with the
U. S. Atomic Energy Commission 3 4yshb 03119560 &b
Operated by The University of Chicago
)
R e T ——TE A Y
e e R TR TR T T T
L ARSI T T
P
T
T Y
e ST T
e e AT T T T YT YT
e T T
wo ot T
kbR R
B o
e iy B b
A, b i R
SECTION III. REACTORS FUELED WITH MOLTEN-SALT
SOLUTIONS. . .. .. e e e e e e e e e e e e e
Chapter 1. Introduétion ...........................
Chapter 2. One-region Reactors .. ... ... ... e
Chapter 3. Two-region Reactors . e
Page
xy
&)
By
il ks
ek o i 3 e B i
PREFACE
This report is an additional section in the Catalog of Nuclear Reactor
Concepts that was begun with ANL-6892 and continued in ANL-6909. As in
the previous reports, the material is divided into chapters, each with text
and references, plus data sheets that cover the individual concepts. The
plan of the catalog, with the report numbers for the sections already issued,
is given on the following page.
Dr. Charles E. Teeter, formerly employed by the Chicago Oper-
ations Office at Argonne, Illinois, is now affiliated with the Southeastern
Massachusetts Technological Institute, New Bedford, Mass. Through a
consultantship arrangement with Argonne National Laboratory, he is con-
tinuing to help guide the organization and compilation of this catalog.
J.H.M. ,
- September, 1965
PLAN OF CATALOG OF REACTOR CONCEPTS
General Introduction ANL.-6892 S
Part I. Homogeneous and Quasi-homogene.ous Reactors ' .
Section I. Particulate-fueled Reactors ~ ANL-6892
Section II. Reactors Fueled with Homogeneous :
' Aqueous Solutions and Slurries ANL-6909
Section III. Reactors Fueled with Molten-salt
Solutions This report
Section IV, Reactors Fueled with Liquid Metals
Section V. Reactors Fueled with Uranium_Hexé.—
fluoride, Gases, or Plasmas
Section VI. Solid Homogeneous Reactors s
Part II. Heterogeneous Reactors
Section I,
Section II,
Section III.
Section IV.
Section V.
Section VI,
Section VII,
Section VIII.
Section IX,
Part III. Miscellaneous Reactor Concepts
Reactors Cooled by Liquid Metals
Gas-cooled Reactors
Organic—cooled Reactors
Boiling Reactors
Reactors Cooled by Supercritical Fluids
Water-cooled Reactors
Reactors Cooled by Other Fluids
Boiling-water Reactofs
Pressurized-water Reactors
ik Bl i M e b
Al Mok i L
PART I. HOMOGENEOUS, AND QUASI-HOMOGENEOUS REACTORS
SECTION III. REACTORS FUELED WITH MOLTEN-SALT SOLUTIONS
Chapter 1. Introduction
The reactor concepts described in this section utilize a fluid fuel
consisting of a fissionable material dissolved in a carrier of molten salt.
Some such concepts also call for a molten salt as a primary coolant.
H. G. MacPherson has reviewed the technology of molten-salt
reactors.ls?
The fissionable compound usually chosen is uranium tetrafluoride.?
Uranium fluorides other than the tetrafluoride have the disadvantages of
higher volatility, instability, or corrosivity. Chlorides or fluorides as
solvents have been given the most consideration because of the need for
radiation stability and high solubility. The chlorides are used for fast
reactors, and the fluorides, because of their low cross sections for ther-
mal neutrons, are best for thermal and epithermal reactors.
Compounds other than fluorides and chlorides have been suggested,
including phosphates,® sulfates,? sulfides,* hydrosulfides,* and hydroxides.5’6
Molten fluoride mixtures, e.g. LiF-NaF, have the most desirable proper-
ties: they dissolve adequate amounts of fuel; they have satisfactory heat
transfer properties; they resist radiation; they can tolerate an accumu-
lation of fission products; the melting points are low enough that corrosion
problems of excessively high temperatures are avoided; and the vapor
pressures are low enough to permit low~-pressure operation.4’7’8 Although
fluorine itself has some moderating properties, a better moderator must
be present, either in the molten-salt mixture or as a separate structure,
to obtain a thermal reactor of reasonable size. The alkali metal fluo-
rides have been especially considered as solvents because they have low
melting points. Beryllium fluoride may be added to the mixture as a
moderator, and thorium tetrafluoride can be added for conversion.
Graphite and beryllium are commonly used as structured moder-
ators. Discussion of structured-moderated reactors in this section may
appear anomalous, in that most reactors in this first part of the catalog
have completely homogeneous cores. The fuel itself, however, is a horno-
geneous solution, and such structure-moderated reactors are otherwise
closely related to the more homogeneous ones.
Molten-salt reactors can be classified in several ways--by the
purpose of the reactor, by the use or nonuse of a separate moderator,
by the cooling method (internal or external), or by the core arrangement
(one- or two-region). For this catalog, the classification will be by one-
and two-region reactors. Chapter 2 will cover the first and Chapter 3
the second. According to MacPherson,7 the most attractive types are the
one-region, graphite-moderated reactor, and the two-region reactor. The
one-region reactor is simpler, and it is cheaper to construct and operate -
for small power stations. Most of the one-region reactors discussed in-
Chapter 2 are burners. The two-region reactor has better neutron econ--
omy, is better for breeding, and, in larger installations, gives higher con-
version ratio and lower fuel-cycle costs. |
o
The origin of the molten-salt concept is not clear. Early in the
1950's, however, molten salts were considered as reactor fuels to satisfy
the need for high temperature and extremely high power densities needed
for reactors intended for nuclear aircraft propulsion. Development work,
- particularly at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, resulted in several con-
cepts, and in 1954 the Aircraft Reactor Experiment (ARE), part of the
Aircraft Nuclear Propulsion Project {ANP), was operated. Since the
-cancellation, .as of October 1957, of work on circulating-fuel reactors
for aircraft,? work has continued aimed at developing power and breeder
reactors that utilize molten salts. | .
Molten-salt reactors are attractive concepts for several rea-
sons.1f2’7 They provide high temperatures in a low-pressure system
to produce steam at temperatures high enough to give high thermal-
cycle efficiencies. They are versatile because of the range of solubili-
ties of different compounds of fissionable elements in salts. The simple
ionic salts are stable under irradiation. Such reactors also have the
advantages of other fluid-fueled reactors; for example, they have high nega-
tive temperature coefficients of reactivity, fission products can be re-
moved continuously, fuel elements need not be fabricated, and make-up
fuel may be added as needed. According to Weinberg,!® a great advantage
is that the fissionable materials can be consumed at very high thexrmal
efficiencies and with extremely high burnup. The major problem with a
salt-fueled reactor is that all the salt in the system must be kept molten
at all times.
In 1959, the Fluid Fuel Reactor Task Force compared the aqueous
homogeneous, molten-salt, and liquid-metal fueled reactors.!! The prin-
cipal conclusions were: the molten-salt reactor had the best chance of
achieving technical feasibility; only with the homogeneous aqueous reactor
was there a possibility of achieving a reasonably short doubling time;
and the total power costs for the MSR were between those for the aqueous
reactor and the liquid-metal-fueled reactor.
x
Salt-fueled reactors are advanced concepts, and there is as yet no
adequate experience for building large-scale power plants, although many ?
concepts have been developed for such plants.” Current development is
represented by the Molten Salt Reactor Experiment, which achieved cri-
ticality at ORNL in mid 1965.
i i s
S G L B i
B gt e
10.
11.
12.
References
H. G. MacPherson, Molten Salt Reactors, Chapter 21 in Reactor
Handbook, Vol. IV, Engineering, Stuart McLain and J. H. Martens,
eds., Interscience Division, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1964.
James A. Lane, H. G. MacPherson, and Frank Maslan, Fluid Fuel
Reactors, Addison Wesley Publishing Co., Reading Mass., 1958.
W. S. Ginell, Molten Phosphate Reactor Fuel. Part I, NAA-SR-
5925, Atomics International, Sept. 30, 1961.
R. C. Crooks, M. J. Snyder, and J. W. Clegg, Fused Salt Mixtures
as Potential Liquid Fuels for Nuclear Power Reactors, BMI-864,
Del., Battelle Memorial Institute, Sept. 8, 1953. Decl. with del.,
Feb. 20, 1957, :
C. S. Dauwalter and J. Y. Estabrook, Circulating Potassium Hy-
droxide Reactors, Y-F¥8-9, Del., ORNL, Dec. 19, 1950.
E. M. Simons and J. H. Stang, Engineering Problems Pertinent to
the Use of Sodium Hydroxide in Reactors, Chemical Engineering -
Progress Symposium Series. Nuclear Engineering, Part I, No. 11,
Vol. 50, AIChE, New York, 1954, pp. 139-144.
H. G. MacPherson to R. W. Ritzmann, Molten-Salt Reactors: Report
for 1960 Ten-Year-Plan Evaluation, Unpublished report, ORNL,
July 25, 1960.
W. R. Grimes, F. F. Blankenship, G. W. Keilholtz, H. F. Poppendiek,
and M. T. Robinson, Chemical Aspects of Molten Fluoride Reactors,
Proc. 2nd U. N. Int. Conf. on Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy,
Geneva, 1958, 28, pp. 99-111, United Nations, New York, 1958,
Aircraft Nuclear Propulsion Project. Quarterly Progress Report
for Period Ending December 31, 1957, A. J. Miller, Project Co-
ordinator, ORNL-2440, Del., ORNL, April 24, 1958. Decl. with
del., Nov 4, 1959 o o -
A, M, Wemberg, Adva.nc:ed Systems--—A Personal Appraisal, Nuclea:__
Eng. 5, No. 53, pp. 463-465, October 1960.
Report of the Fluid Fuel Reactors Task Force, TID- 850'7 USAEC,
Feb. 1959..
W. R. Grimes, Molten Salts as Reactor Materials, Nuclear News.
7, No. 5, pp. 3-8, May 1964.
10
my
YT ORI e v v B
T
S e
ik s
11
Chapter 2. One-region Reactors
Most of the one-region reactors discussed in this chapter are
burners, with highly enriched uranium in the molten fuel and no external
blanket. The converters have either partially enriched uranium or tho-
rium salts as fertile material in the fuel-salt mixture. One-region re-
actors have been considered both for aircraft propulsion and for the
generation of heat and electrical power. The ANP (Aircraft Nuclear
Propulsion) Project led to many concepts, and one reactor experiment,
ARE (Aircraft Reactor Experiment), was operated for a short time. As
part of the Aircraft Nuclear Propulsion Project, several designs for
molten-salt-fueled aircraft reactors were proposed both before and
after the operation of the Aircraft Reactor Experiment. In addition to
the studies at ORNL, work was carried out by such contractors as the
H. K. Ferguson Company and the Pratt & Whitney Aircraft Company.
In 1957, however, work on circulating-fuel reactors for aircraft was
discontinued. The MSRE (Molten Salt Reactor Experiment) is the cur-
rent major effort on this type of reactor, with criticality achieved in
mid 1965.
Reactors for Propulsion
Early Concepts
Concepts reported by H. K. Ferguson in 1950 and 1951 included
both reactors fueled with molten fluorides and a few fueled with suspen-
sions of uranium oxide in molten sodium hydroxide. The suspensions
were used because of the difficulty of dissolving uranium compounds in
NaOH. These suspensions are included here, although they canrnot be
defined as molten-salt: solutlons
In the Homogeneous Circulating Suspension Reactor, the fuel is
a suspension of 2.2 wt.% uranium oxide in sodium hydroxide, which acts
as moderator.! The fuel enters the top of the reactor, where a whirl-
ing motion is 1mparted to 1t by vanes, and leaves through the bottom ta
a heat exchanger.
In a similar concept,! the fuel is a coarse suspension of the oxide
in sodium hydroxide, which circulates through a spherical reactor. The
oxide is removed in a cyclone separator; the liquid passes through a
heat exchanger, and then picks up the oxide before returning to the core.
The Circulating-fluoride. Reactor concept includes beryllium
rods as moderator and a molten fluoride fuel, which circulates to a
wraparound heat exchanger.” This concept was studied as a variation
of a reactor fueled with molten metal.
12
circulating fuel, and to study the kinetic behavior of the reactor.
In another concept,’ the beryllium moderator is in different forms.
In one, it is distributed throughout the core; in the other, it is a reflec-
tor layer. |
™
The Circulating Moderator- coolant Reactor utilized uranium
tetrafluoride dissolved in a molten mixture of sodium and beryllium
fluorides.? Instead of a solid moderator, molten sodium hydroxide is
used as moderator, coolant, and reflector. The sodium hydroxide flows
‘downward through tubes in the core to cool the quiescent fuel salt. Sec-
ondary cooling is by exchange with sodium in a heat exchanger. The re-
flector is a jacket of the hydroxide around the core. The design power
for this reactor is 140 MW(t). A very similar reactor is the Circulating-
moderator ARE,?
-~ In 1952, Dayton and Chastain made calculations for the desigh of
one- and two-region circulating reactors using hydroxides as moderator-
‘coolants.* The compounds studied were sodium hydroxide, lithium-7
hydroxide, and lithium-7 deuteroxide. Uranium-233 oxide, suspended in
the hydroxide within the spherical reactor, was the fuel specified. For
the one-region reactors, thorium oxide was added to the fuel for breed-
ing. The conversion ratios were so low that the authors concluded that
internal breeding would not be feasible if a small critical mass were
required. If, however, cost and size are not considered, Li’OD appears
to be the most attractive of the compounds.
Two ORNL designs were for a 200-MW(t) Aircraft Reactor (1951)3
and a C;irculating-fuel Reactor for Direct Heat Transfer to Engines
(1953).
In the first reactor, the fuel--a molten mixture of beryllium,
sodium, and uranium fluorides--does not circulate. It is contained in
U-tubes, which are within coolant tubes through which sodium circulates.
Beryllium oxide is the moderator and reflector in the cylindrical reactor.
This was intended to be a full-scale reactor, and the ARE was to dupli-
cate it as far as possible in materials, temperature pattern, and kinetics,
but not in fuel circulation or power. In the second reactor, hot fuel cir-
culates from the core directly to the aircraft engine; otherwise this re-
actor is similar in many respects to the first.
The Aircraft Reactor Experiment
The ARE was built at Oak Ridge National Laborétory as a
circulating-fuel reactor of low power and high temperature, but materi-
als suitable for use in a reactor of high power were employed.”"? Ac-
-cording to Weinberg, "The purpose of this reactor experiment was simply
to gain experience in handling salts in a reactor at very high tempera-
tures, to see whether one could in fact contain the intensely radioactive
n10
o G A b e
e e R e . e
13
Before the circulating fuel was decided upon, solid fuel pins and
stagnant fluoride fuels were considered.!!
Stagnant fluoride fuel was used in the first design.!! The core
would have a cylindrical moderator matrix, containing vertical holes
into which small fuel tubes would be placed. This assembly would be
‘within a cylindrical pressure shell, through which sodium would be pas-
sed. A slab of boron carbide would be placed at the top of the lattice,
and the fuel tubes would extend through the slab, which would act as a
"neutron curtain” for control. Severe problems, however, made this
concept less attractive than a circulating-fuel reactor. The molten salts
have poor thermal conductivity. The extremely large thermal gradiant
at reasonably high power levels would make the temperature of the fuel
near the center of the tube prohibitively high. There would be difficul-
ties in loading the reactor. Also, during loading, large control rods
would be needed, and the heat cycling and draining of coolant between
fuel additions would pose many problems. Expansion during melting
might be a problem relative to possible deformation (expansion) or
rupture.
The final fuel was uranium tetrafluoride dissolved in a mixture
of sodium and zirconium fluorides. Beryllium oxide was the moderator
and reflector; blocks of it were stacked around the fuel tubes, tubes for
reflector cooling, and control assemblies that passed vertically through
the core. The fuel took a serpentine path through parallel circuits to
the outside of the core, finally leaving at the bottom. It circulated to an
external heat exchanger then back to the core. Sodium passing through
tubes in the moderator cooled it. Barren fuel salt also had been sug-
gested as coolant. The maximum design power was 2.5 MW{(t).'*’1* The
reactor became critical on November 11, 1954, and it was shut down
the following evening. It had demonstrated the feasibility of using a
high-temperature fluoride fuel in a circulating—fuel reactor.'®
A reactor with a tandem heat exchanger was suggested as a
modification of the ARE.!® The moderator - reflector is water or sodium
hydroxide, with the core and the tandem heat exchanger being surrounded
by a layer of water at 300-350 psi. The fuel enters the reactor at the
top, makes a loop through fuel tubes in the reactor, and exits to heat ex-
changers. The moderator enters the lattice around the periphery at the
rear of the reactor and flows to an outlet at the forward end.
In another modification, the fuel-coolant salt circulated through
the coolant tubes in the BeO reflector of the ARE.!® In this modification,
there would be a larger 1eakage of high-energy neutrons and of gamma
radiation than with barren fuel salt as moderator coolant.
14
'The Fireball and Related Concepts
A éoncept that originated before the operation of the ARE and was
scheduled for use in later developments was a circulating-fuel, reflector-
moderated reactor, known originally as the Fireball.!"!® In this reactor :
‘there are no fuel tubes. The fuel circulates in an annulus betwee'n a cen-
tral island of berylliurm moderator and an outer shell of moderator and
reflector. In the earliest design the central island was spherical, but
later development resulted in a vase-shaped island.’® This shape, ac-
~cording to Fraas, reduces the critical mass, improves power distribu-
tion, and hydrodynamically gives the best passage for fuel.’® Cooling is"
by circulating the fluid salt to a circumferential wraparound heat exchanger
between the moderator shell and the pressure shell. There heat transfer
to sodium or sodium-potassium takes place. The fuel passes downward
in the annulus, then outward. The moderator is cooled by sodium flowing
downward between the beryllium and the enclosing shell.
_ Fraas and Savolainen have discussed eight core designs for the
spherical reflector-moderated reactor, with a wraparound heat exchanger,
that are related to the Fireball.!? .
The simplest design is the core in which a thick spherical mod-
erator shell surrounds a spherical chamber for liquid fuel. The shell
has top and bottom ducts for fuel to pass in and out of the core. Because
of absorption of neutrons near the fuel-reflector interface, power density
decreases to a comparatively low value near the center. Also, the flow
pattern is indeterminate. Vanes or screens at the inlet might improve
the flow.
Adding a central island reduces critical mass and gives a more
uniform power distribution. The moderator, however, must be cooled in
this design. Liquid bismuth or lead could be circulated between the fuel
and moderator regions to remove the heat.
Graphite was suggested in two other modifications. A block of
graphite containing parallel passages for fuel flow is placed in the central
zone to give a nearly homogeneous mixture of fuel and graphite in the
core. Concentric shells of graphite could be used as moderator and as
guides for the fuel flow. The authors concluded that these designs were
little better, from the nuclear standpoint, than the simple core with no
moderator structure.
Three designs were for the use of molten sodium hydroxide as a
liquid moderator. In one, the moderator passes through coiled tubes in
the core. The tubes would both serve as moderator in the core and im-
prove distribution of fuel velocity. It would, however, be difficult to , “
avoid local hot spots, and the structural material would capture a high
el g BB, &
15
percentage of neutrons, so that the critical mass would be increased. In
two other modifications, fuel passes through tubes and the hydroxide mod-
erator circulates through spaces between fuel passages. In one design,
the tubes are straight. In the other, they are curved to fit the shell con-
tours, in order to reduce the volume of header regions and to give a more
‘nearly spherical core shape, with lower shield weight.
Some concepts that have employed the Fireball design with little
change are the Aircraft Reactor Test,?® The Circulating Fluoride- fuel
High Flux Reactor,?! and a modified Fireball concept of General Electric.
In the High-flux :Reactor;, which includes a central island of graphite, use
of a layer of bismuth between the central island and the fuel layer was
suggested by the author to resist flow of thermal neutrons from the central
island, where they are created, to the shell, where they are absorbed. It
would also protect the internal island from gamma radiation.
22
Pratt & Whitney concepts were originally variations and develop-
ments of the Fireball design, with changes in the dimensions and other
factors to give reactors of different power 1eve1_s,23’24 In two simplified
versions?® the annulus of the Fireball is replaced by five tubes in the
center of the core. In one, the core is a graphite cylinder and in the
other it is a beryllium sphere. The design was intended to give more
structural stability and to alleviate problems of flow separation. Graph-
ite was used to obtain more favorable critical mass and power distribu-
tion. The beryllium-moderated concept was developed into a more complete
design.?® In another modification, the island is cylindrical, rather than
vase shaped as in the original Fireball.?” Other variations considered
briefly were the use of beryllium, beryllium oxide, or graphite for the
island and for the reflector, and using and not using a reflector. Alterna-
tive fuels considered were lithium or beryllium fluorides as bases for
fuels, and slurries of uranium dioxides in alkali metals.?® Lithium-7 was
considered as a coolant,*® and zirconium hydride as a moderator.
The use of zirconium hydride as a moderator was Jincorporated in
one concept.’® The core consists of fuel tubes and zirconium hydride
rods, with lithium-7 flowing parallel to the tubes. Two arrangements of
fuel tubes were studied. In one, a multitube arrangement; the fuel flows
down through the inner tubes then returns through the outer tubes. In the
other, a thimble-tube design, the fuel flows through an inner tube and re-
turns through the annulus between this tube and an enclosing outer tube.
Lithium-7 could circulate directly to the engine radiator. The hydride
moderator, which would be clad with molybdenum, is claimed to permit
high tempeérature without the néeed for excessive cooling or structural
support.
In 1955, staff members at the Walter Kidde Nuclear Laboratories,
Inc., published designs for reactors for aircraft propulsion.??
16
One reactor was similar to an earlier concept of H. K. Ferguson
Co. The fuel is stationary, within tubes. A great many tubes are re-
‘quired because they must be small to avoid excessive internal tempera-
tures. Heat removal would be difficult because of the poor conductivity
of the molten salts.
Three were circulating-molten-salt reactors, two closely re-
sembling earlier concepts. They included a reactor having the Fireball
structure, with a modification in which the core is cylindrical rather
than spherical; a circulating-fluoride reactor with rods of beryllium
moderator in the core; and a circulating~fluoride reactor with molten
sodium hydroxide as moderator and reflector.
An ORSORT concept, the Screwball (1953), differed from the Fire-
ball chiefly in that helical fuel tubes replaced the annular passage be-
tween the central island, which was eliminated, and the moderator shel
Thus it somewhat resembles the Pratt & Whitney concept described in
Ref. 26. The moderator is circulating NaOD. According to the authors,
problems with the Fireball design indicated need for changes. The Screw-
ball design is claimed to eliminate or alleviate all but one, namely,
pressure surges. Use of fuel tubes reduces uncertainty of sustained in-
stabilities in fuel region. "Self-shielding" should be less with the tubes
than with the spherical fuel annulus of the Fireball. Lower power den-
sity (2.5 'kW/cm3) was chosen to aid problems of questionable fuel density.
Removal of the solid island eliminates the need to cool it. The pressure-
surge problem was not alleviated. Surges may be larger with Screwball
because of the tortuous expansion path out of the core, but pressure is
not expected to be great enough to cause difficulty. Substitution of circu-
lating NaOD leads to problems with corrosion; stagnant or low-velocity
layers of NaOD next to hot fuel tubes or containing shell, therefore, must
not occur.
1030
Reactor for Ship Propulsion
ORSORT students designed a molten-salt reactor for ship propul-
sion, which contained many of the features of the aircraft reactor con-
cepts.’! A compact, high-performance reactor was sought in order to
reduce weight. In the cylindrical reactor core, the moderator is an
array of Inconel-clad beryllium oxide rods tipped with poison material
to reduce end leakage and fissioning in the entrance and exit plenums for
the fuel. The fuel flows up through the central core region, then down
through an annular downcomer at the core periphery. There it enters a
wraparound heat exchanger, which is cooled by molten salt. This
125-MW(t) reactor has a nickel reflector, as well as extensive shielding.
An advanced design of this type of reactor was conceived by the
same group to improve reactor performance and reduce weight. To im-
prove moderation in the core, the designers substituted zircohium hydride
. _
17
for beryllium oxide as moderator and used a beryllium-containing fuel.
Nickel-molybdenum cladding was substituted for Inconel cladding in the
core because thinner cladding could be used to reduce the amount of
poison in the core. In the resulting design, dimensions and power level
were reduced.
Reactors for Electrical Power and Heat
Even before the Aircraft Reactor Experiment was carried out,
some one-region reactors had been proposed for purposes other than
aircraft propulsion. Development of such reactors has continued. Theyvy
include some designs that generally resemble the ARE in core structure.
Farly Concepts
i
™ il
An early concept, on which little has been published, is for a
thorium converter for electrical power production, which was developed
by Davidson and Robb.** In this converter, the fuel is a solution of
93 percent enriched U?*®F, in molten fluorides containing thorium fluo-
ride for conversion.
Four concepts, by students at the Oak Ridge School of Reactor
Technology, are intended for power and heat, and one is a breeder.
The Fused Salt Reactor for Power and Heat, proposed in 1953,
could be either a burner or converter, with thorium fluoride added to
the molten salt if conversion is desired.?® The core is a graphite
sphere, through which fuel circulates from the bottom through chan-
nels cut into the graphite. The graphite is clad with an Inconel shell
and is contained in an Inconel pressure vessel. The reactor is designed
for installation at remote locations to produce power--about 5 MW(t)-~-
and heat. The heat is produced by water heated by low-pressure waste
gas from the turbine.
In the Fused Salt Breeder Reactor (FSBR),** the fuel is a solu-
tion of uranium-233 fluoride and thorium fluoride in fused lithium-7
fluoride and beryllium fluoride. Stacked graphite blocks form the core,
which has a spherical top, a flat bottom, and cylindrical sides. The fuel
passes through passages in the graphite and through heat exchangers
in the graphite surrounding the core. The fuel passes to intermediate
heat exchangers cooled by sodium. Two sizes were considered, one for
125 MW{e) and one for 250 MW({e). . -
The 600-MW Fused Salt Homogeneous Reactor Power Plant?®
utilizes a fuel salt of fluorides of uranium-235, zirconium, and sodium.
The reactor is stated to be self-moderating because of the fluorine.
oo e b ke s
18
The reactor vessel is a vertical cylinder, with a dished bottom, of stain-
less steel. The fuel circulates through the multipass vessel upward to
a sodium loop within the vessel, to an annular U-tube heat exchanger,
and to a secondary heat exchanger. The design of this burner could be
altered so as to breed uranium-235.
~ The Fused Salt Reactor for Process Heat (1956)36 has two features
that differ somewhat from previous designs. The aim was to generate as
much heat as possible in the regions of the reactor not bearing fuel and-
to use a ceramic as both moderator and heat-exchange medium for high-
temperature heat exchangers. Magnesium oxide was chosen as the best
available material to meet both requirements, even though it is not a
very good moderator. The reactor consists of a cylindrical matrix of
hexagonal magnesium oxide blocks penetrated by Inconel tubes in a tri-
angular array. Fuel circulates through these tubes. Beryllium oxide
‘reflector surrounds the core, and a steel pressure vessel is the con-
tainer. Of the 400 MW(t) produced by the reactor, 35 Mw is generated
in the MgO moderator and is used to heat steam from heat exchangers.
The moderator is perforated to allow passage of steam. The remaining
heat is removed by the fuel circulating to external heat exchangers. The
design is for four reactors to be used in conjunction with a coal-
hydrogenation plant. The high-temperature steam from the moderator
would be used to gasify coal to produce hydrogen for the hydrogenation.
The remaining steam, at a lower temperature, would be used to drive
turbines. | |
The use of natural convection has been suggested to eliminate the
problem of providing reliable, long-lived pumps for fuel circulation.??:?®
This advantage is at the cost of a greater fuel volume. The fuel circu-
lates by natural convection through the core, vertical convection risers,
and primary heat exchangers. In the design suggested, the core is spher-
ical, with the primary heat exchanger above the core. The heat-exchange
medium may be either molten salt or helium. Either would give a power
of 22 MW(e). This system may be attractive for some applications because
of easy maintenance and good reliability.
Molten lead is suggested as coolant in an ORNL concept of 1958.%?
The only moderator is the fluorine in the fuel salt--NaF-ZrF,~-UF,. The
molten lead circulates the fuel salt by direct mixing with a jet pump.
Heat exchange is rapid and no primary exchanger is needed. The lead
is separated from the salt downstream by a pipeline separator; the fuel
goes to the core, the lead to a heat exchanger. The design power is
194 MW (e). | ‘
The MSRE and Related Concepts
Before the design of the MSRE was decided upon, other concepts
originated from the Molten Salt Reactor Project at Oak Ridge National
[RVIPTRRIFIpE ST
Ll s R T e
19
Laboratory. Two that were developed furthest were the Slightly Enriched,
Fused-Salt-Fueled Reactor and the Experimental Molten-Salt-Fueled
30 MW(t) Power Reactor.
Predeces sdrs to MSRE
The Slightly Enriched, Fused-Salt-Fueled Reactor*™* is a conver-
ter fueled with slightly enriched uranium tetrafluoride dissolved in molten
lithium fluoride and beryllium fluoride. It was proposed in 1958, and a
preliminary design was published in 1959. The cylindrical core is of un-
clad graphite, which serves as moderator. The fuel flows upward through
holes in the graphite. Highly enriched uranium is added as makeup fuel.
The reactor produces 315 MW(e).
The Experimental Molten-Salt-Fueled 30-MW(t) Power Reactor*:*?
is a burner fueled with highly enriched uranium tetrafluoride dissolved in
molten lithium fluoride and beryllium fluoride. There is no other mod-
erator. The core is a sphere of INOR-8. The fuel circulates to a heat
exchanger. Barren molten salt--lithium fluoride-beryllium fluoride--is
the secondary coolant.
MSRE
The Molten Salt Reactor Experirnent'?“*"‘r6 is the first of the three
stages in the development of molten-salt reactors discussed by MacPherson
in 1960.%7 After this one-region reactor, a two-region reactor experiment
was planned, and a high-power prototype of a molten-salt reactor would
follow. ‘
The MSRE has the objectives of showing that a circulating molten-
salt-fuel system will operate successfully and demonstrating a reactor
type that can be developed into an advanced converter or thermal breeder.
It also is intended to demonstrate that unclad graphite is a satisfactory
moderator that can be used in contact with molten salts for extended
periods and that on-site hydrofluorination processing ¢can clean up con-
taminated fuel.
The MSRE is a converter, with the possibility of internal breeding.
In structure it resembles the Aircraft Reactor Experiment more closely
than such later aircraft reactor developments as the Fireball. The mod-
erator consists of vertical stringers of graphite, which form a cylindrical
core within a reactor vessel. The fuel passes downward in an annulus
bétween the graphite cylinder and the containing vessel. It then flows
upward in channels formed between the stringers, out the top to a heat
exchanger (in which the intermediate coolant is LiF-BeF,), and back to
the core.
A P
Cogelos Ao k- G bl