Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DOC] Add document for new guardrail type #7353

Closed
1 of 4 tasks
ylwu-amzn opened this issue Jun 10, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #7377
Closed
1 of 4 tasks

[DOC] Add document for new guardrail type #7353

ylwu-amzn opened this issue Jun 10, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #7377
Assignees
Labels
3 - Done Issue is done/complete v2.15.0

Comments

@ylwu-amzn
Copy link
Contributor

What do you want to do?

  • Request a change to existing documentation
  • Add new documentation
  • Report a technical problem with the documentation
  • Other

Tell us about your request. Provide a summary of the request and all versions that are affected.
We are going to build a new guardrail type in 2.15 which based on LLM. opensearch-project/ml-commons#2463

What other resources are available? Provide links to related issues, POCs, steps for testing, etc.

@ylwu-amzn
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jngz-es please prepare draft PR

@hdhalter hdhalter added 1 - Backlog - DEV Developer assigned to issue is responsible for creating PR. and removed untriaged labels Jun 10, 2024
@hdhalter hdhalter added 2 - In progress Issue/PR: The issue or PR is in progress. v2.15.0 and removed 1 - Backlog - DEV Developer assigned to issue is responsible for creating PR. labels Jun 12, 2024
@hdhalter hdhalter changed the title [DOC] Add document for new guradrail type [DOC] Add document for new guardrail type Jun 24, 2024
@hdhalter hdhalter added 3 - Done Issue is done/complete and removed 2 - In progress Issue/PR: The issue or PR is in progress. labels Jun 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
3 - Done Issue is done/complete v2.15.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants