Skip to content

Var, Call and other constructs in default rule #338

Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

Hi @anakrish 👋 That's an interesting observation! I would believe that to be a bug. Trying your example I had no problems depending on input, data and built-in functions inside of the comprehension, creating non-deterministic default values. I don't think that should ever work. I'll create an issue.

Replies: 1 comment 1 reply

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
1 reply
@anderseknert
Comment options

Answer selected by anakrish
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
2 participants