creative use of Canto

[ValWood]

I think we have seen this before. Use of GO terms to annotate mutants.
I could easily fix to the correct GO and FYPO, but perhaps we should prevent the use at some point.

[PCarme]

Yep, I stumbled upon the same issue not so long ago #2850.

[ValWood]

duplicate (incidentally it's the same lab). I don't really mind fixing them because she does such an amazing job;)
I will mention it in the feedback.

It might not be worth fixing in Canto because I didn't know we could even do this until the previous ticket so nobody else has figured it out.

[ValWood]

I can see why it happened too. The assay was for the activity, but it was done with mutant combinations. It makes sense, especially as the relevant phenotype terms weren't there.