Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider integration with ioos checker plugin #44

Open
pp-mo opened this issue Mar 14, 2022 · 8 comments
Open

Consider integration with ioos checker plugin #44

pp-mo opened this issue Mar 14, 2022 · 8 comments

Comments

@pp-mo
Copy link
Owner

pp-mo commented Mar 14, 2022

See https://github.com/ioos/cc-plugin-ugrid

@ocefpaf suggests a code sprint : ioos/ioos-code-sprint#6
Potentially, this would be April 25 - 28, 2022

@ocefpaf
Copy link

ocefpaf commented Mar 14, 2022

Note that it would be nice to have you all at the code sprint for other topics unrelated to ugrid. Hopefully the remove alternative will make it easier to attend. However, it would be awesome to have you for the in person event.

@pp-mo
Copy link
Owner Author

pp-mo commented Mar 17, 2022

@ocefpaf thanks
TBH I think Chicago is probably a bit of a stretch for us right now.
But some involvement should certainly be possible.

Noticing in

"General Python :: strategies for querying/visualizing gridded data (pygeoapi, stac, xarray) as outputs get larger (higher resolution, more variables)"

Maybe we could present on Geovista / PyVista ?
That's looking like our solution of choice here (though our Scientists are really only just getting started on using 3d viz )

(
N.B. :
Geovista is still a bit obscure + the strapline doesn't clearly sell it IMHO

  • basically, adds earth-surface handling to PyVista, for cartographic analysis and plotting

proper docs in the pipeline, but bjlittle did just promise to slightly improve it -- ?? didn't you @bjlittle ?!?
)

@pp-mo
Copy link
Owner Author

pp-mo commented Mar 17, 2022

P.S.

Geovista is still a bit obscure + the strapline doesn't clearly sell it IMHO

@trexfeathers suggests this from the Iris docs : https://scitools-iris.readthedocs.io/en/v3.2.1/further_topics/ugrid/partner_packages.html#geovista
That is perhaps more understandable.

@ocefpaf
Copy link

ocefpaf commented Mar 17, 2022

The "main" event is focused on Software discussion/hacking but there will be lightning talks and I believe geovista is definitely worth mentioning in one of them.

@pp-mo
Copy link
Owner Author

pp-mo commented Apr 22, 2022

If there's still space, then we could inject a lightning talk on GeoVista, as you suggest.
The best person is probably @bjlittle - currently on holiday but back next week, I believe.
Or @trexfeathers has also written something maybe suitable, which we delivered a couple of weeks back.

@ocefpaf
Copy link

ocefpaf commented Apr 25, 2022

I believe there is. Did you all register for it? Are you in touch with @MathewBiddle?

@pp-mo
Copy link
Owner Author

pp-mo commented Apr 25, 2022

I believe there is. Did you all register for it? Are you in touch with @MathewBiddle?

Actually no, I wasn't sure who to approach.
I don't have access to the Slack account, if that is where things are happening, since it is available only to specified domains and I couldn't find a visible contact to apply for access.
-- and I left it much too late, of course 😉

Regarding possible use of the ugrid-checks code

I have already created a proof-of-concept solution (incomplete, and not yet visible here) to provide checking results in a suitable form for inclusion in an IOOS-style Report object.
So, if anyone is interested, I think we could collaborate on creating an ioos plugin to integrate ugrid-checks via such an interface.
It makes sense to me, that we would want the plugin in its own project/repo. But of course, the sprint may simply not be a very good time, since the time difference can be a bit of an obstacle.
Also, I still remain to be convinced that this is particularly wanted -- but the interfacing problem did pique my interest !

@ocefpaf
Copy link

ocefpaf commented Apr 26, 2022

Folks are discussing that today and tomorrow during the compliance-checker sprint. If you reach out to Matt he will send you the URLs you need to connect. It is be zoom for discussion and slack for async/pasting text.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants