-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Please consider supporting the current release of async_zip #14
Comments
Yeah unfortunately the update to async-rs removes buffering while reading the central archive which results in more range requests. I still have to figure out the best way to properly fix this. @charliermarsh Did you end up finding a proper fix for uv? Or are you using a workaround? |
@baszalmstra - Unfortunately I ended up reverting that specific change in my own fork: charliermarsh/rs-async-zip#2 |
@musicinmybrain Would it be possible to use charlies fork for the PR? |
Yes, we’re able to bundle git dependencies in cases like this where it’s necessary/justifiable. I appreciate the link to the PR, since it clearly explains why this is needed. I am investigating whether we should create a compat package for Thanks for helping explain the situation. I do hope that there will be a way to go back to https://crates.io/crates/async_zip at some point in the future. |
I was investigating packaging this crate for Fedora Linux as a dependency for a potential
uv
package.It would be very helpful if
async_http_range_reader
could support the current release ofasync_zip
, 0.0.17, instead of requiring 0.0.15. Release notes for 0.0.16 are here and for 0.0.17 are here.I tried to start a PR for updating at least to 0.0.16. I needed to make a couple of changes because as of 0.0.16,
StoredZipEntry
now implementsDeref
(but no longer has anentry()
method):Unfortunately, this isn’t enough to make the tests pass:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: