[p5.js 2.0 RFC Proposal]: use lighter dependency

[asukaminato0721]

Increasing access

p5.js use some sub-dependency which use unnecessary spaces. So use lighter dependencies.

Which types of changes would be made?

• Breaking change (Add-on libraries or sketches will work differently even if their code stays the same.)
• Systemic change (Many features or contributor workflows will be affected.)
• Overdue change (Modifications will be made that have been desirable for a long time.)
• Unsure (The community can help to determine the type of change.)

Most appropriate sub-area of p5.js?

• Accessibility
• Color
• Core/Environment/Rendering
• Data
• DOM
• Events
• Image
• IO
• Math
• Typography
• Utilities
• WebGL
• Build process
• Unit testing
• Internationalization
• Friendly errors
• Other (specify if possible)

What's the problem?

try to reduce a bit of build size/npm install size.

What's the solution?

use https://github.com/SukkaW/nolyfill

Pros (updated based on community comments)

Example list:

• Consistency: This proposal will not affect current behavior...
• Size: This proposal will reduce the build/download size.

Cons (updated based on community comments)

• require node >= 12 but currently it's already node >= 20

Proposal status

Under review

[limzykenneth]

I think this is no longer necessary as we are only using eslint itself and not the referenced eslint plugins dependencies.

[limzykenneth]

Looking at the diff of the PR it doesn't seem to be necessary so I'll close this for now. Feel free to comment if there are something else related to this.