Phase 3 Revision 1

timeline
Title Phase 3 Revision 1
Section Overview
Who's responsible? : Author + Editor
Expected timeframe? : 30 days

Loading

timeline
Section Process
Revise : Agree on a timeframe for the author to make the suggested revisions - a month is usually reasonable : Ask them to post a comment in the Issue when their draft is ready for your review.
Respond : Remember that editing is a collaborative process, and will involve dialogue : Be prepared to offer generous support – the depth of editorial work involved at this phase will vary from lesson to lesson
Reviewers <br> When to contact : Are substantive revisions needed before peer review can proceed? The right time to identify and invite two external peer reviewers, depends whether the first-round revisions are major or minor : If you think the required changes are substantial, you may want to wait until you feel satisfied with the revisions : If the required changes are minor, you may feel able to begin considering who to approach immediately, with advance notice of when you think the lesson will be ready for review.
Reviewers <br> Who to contact : As part of our commitment to diversity, we encourage you to make a sufficient effort to invite reviewers who are distinct from you either by gender, nationality, race, age, or academic background : We created two short videos which may be useful (links below).

Loading

Finding Peer Reviewers for Technical Tutorials (5:06)
Approaching Peer Reviewers for Technical Tutorials (9:06)