-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 822
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Some questions on your test process and result (TUM RGB-D Benchmark) #28
Comments
Hi bjornph, |
I had to stop working on it to try something else for some time. However I've looked at it for the last couple of days. Have you gotten it to work? I made it work good on some and not on others. Which datasets are you trying to run? The ORB-SLAM paper has a nice overview of it in Table III. My tests:
My test setup:
Notes/questions: Hope this helps some. Keep me updated if you get any breakthrough. I promise it won't take as long to answer next time. |
Thanks for your reply. For the calibration I'm using the ROS default parameters for all the datasets, because are the raccomanded ones on the TUM website. Can you be so kind to give me the script to calculate the scale? I've tried to write it but without success. |
Hope this helps [1] https://github.com/bjornph/lsd_files |
@bjornph |
So nice that it worked, some questions?
Your question: I am not sure what you mean, but if it's this part you are referring to: "For comparison we show respective results from semi-dense mono-VO |
May I ask a question? |
@weichnn I have not looked at this in quite some time, so I am not sure. I would ask this question in the lsd_slam github page. My guess is that you don't load the correct reps in your bash file. Good luck |
In project readme: Instead, this is solved in LSD-SLAM by publishing keyframes and their poses separately: so, I use topic /lsd_slam/graph now. thanks. @bjornph |
@bjornph Sorry, did you do some pre-processing to the ground truth data or the keyframeTrayectory that ORB SLAM provides you before use the "online evaluation" ? i got very bad results with the freiburg1 sequences |
@dawei22 I do not recall the specific details of my test. What kind of results are you getting? |
Hi @bjornph, Traceback (most recent call last): Do you have any idea how to solve this ? how did you manage to get time data in your example approximately the same as in ground truth ? thanks !! |
Hello someone, I am trying to do first steps: 1 To record keyframes I use "rostopic echo -p /lsd_slam/keyframes/camToWorld > lsd_camToWorld.txt" and "rostopic echo -p /lsd_slam/keyframes/time > lsd_time.txt". My files camToWorld.txt and time.txt are empties PARAMETERS
haidara@haidara-virtual-machine: haidara@haidara-virtual-machine:~$ rostopic echo -p /lsd_slam/keyframes/camToWorld > lsd_camToWorld.txt Can someone please help me out on this one. |
Hello bjorn, I'm also trying to use TUM online tool to evaluate LSD_SLAM and followed your instructions from the previous commentaries. But, I run into a problem. My lsd_time.txt is being generated with wrong information, or at least not in the format that TUM uses to compare. Comparing with your file my parameter "field" on lsd_time are wrong, i get values like 1.79999876022 while you get values like 1341845820.99. So, as my lsd_time is at the wrong format TUM tool can't find any timestamp correspondences. I also run your scripts, and I get error "Index exceeds matrix dimensions" due to the values from lsd_time, because I run with your files and everything worked fine.. Do you know why i'm getting these wrong values in lsd_time? Thanks |
I am testing ORB-SLAM (and LSD-SLAM) on the TUM RGB-D Benchmark dataset, and I have some question on your test process:
ORB questions:
LSD-SLAM questions:
Thank you
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: