Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert back to CRD terminology vs. certificates #346

Open
james-ball-qualcomm opened this issue Dec 4, 2024 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #405
Open

Revert back to CRD terminology vs. certificates #346

james-ball-qualcomm opened this issue Dec 4, 2024 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #405
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@james-ball-qualcomm
Copy link
Collaborator

Now that I've thought this through better (see slides at https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1dc7-uWNIHd6qMNlhWxfwCnzACQaSL2vfkHqP_qdpkac and screenshot of key slide below), I need to go back to having what is currently called certificate_models to CRD somehow.

image

@james-ball-qualcomm
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Just going to rename the backend generator to CRD. The /arch files can stay unchanged.

@james-ball-qualcomm
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Also going to add "Processor" prefix to Certificate Class/Model to support non-processor certificates that don't follow this class/model naming scheme.

@james-ball-qualcomm james-ball-qualcomm linked a pull request Jan 10, 2025 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant