Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refbox OPC-UA communication #14

Closed
morxa opened this issue Dec 20, 2018 · 3 comments · Fixed by #32
Closed

Refbox OPC-UA communication #14

morxa opened this issue Dec 20, 2018 · 3 comments · Fixed by #32
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@morxa
Copy link
Member

morxa commented Dec 20, 2018

Replace the communication to the MPS machines with a OPC-UA communication based on open62541.

For testing, use the mockup developed in robocup-logistics/rcll-mps-stations#1.

@morxa morxa added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 20, 2018
@morxa morxa self-assigned this Dec 20, 2018
@morxa morxa changed the title Implement OPC-UA communication in the refbox Refbox OPC-UA communication Dec 20, 2018
@morxa morxa added this to the German Open 2019 milestone Dec 20, 2018
@morxa
Copy link
Member Author

morxa commented Dec 20, 2018

The open62541 library is available on Fedora. I started to co-maintain the package to make sure that the package is in good shape. I also updated the package to the latest release.

@timn
Copy link
Member

timn commented Jan 2, 2019

You should also check Ubuntu or provide a PPA (similar to my CLIPS PPA). We had Ubuntu installed on the provided referee box machines a couple times in the past.

@morxa
Copy link
Member Author

morxa commented Feb 15, 2019

As discussed yesterday in a meeting, we will first merge the current master into new-mps-communication and start working from there. This allows us to use the new communication protocol between refbox and MPS stations and directly implement OPC-UA communication with the new protocol instead of replacing modbus with OPC-UA in the old protocol.

For this, I first want #16 to be merged into master, as it may bring additional conflicts.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants