Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improved armor long rest automation #127

Open
bicheichane opened this issue Feb 4, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Improved armor long rest automation #127

bicheichane opened this issue Feb 4, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request external help wanted Creator won't implement this feature

Comments

@bicheichane
Copy link

Armor long rest automation would be a lot more powerful if we would be able to reference a Rest Recovery Profile (henceforth profile B). Either replace the existing configuration options for armor long rest automation, or as a selectable alternative, enable a dropdown that allows us to reference a profile. In this way, the Long Rest section of this profile B would override the settings of the parent profile A if a character would choose to carry on the long rest with armor equipped.

The differences between these long rest profiles would be displayed to the user (and only the differences), so they would be able to always make an informed decision.

Any eventual armored long rest configuration of profile B would be ignored to prevent profile chains or recursion.

@bicheichane bicheichane added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 4, 2023
@Haxxer Haxxer removed their assignment Feb 4, 2023
@Haxxer
Copy link
Collaborator

Haxxer commented Feb 4, 2023

There a a low likelyhood that I will implement this, but anyone else (or you!) are free to implement this feature and create a pull request :)

@Haxxer Haxxer added the external help wanted Creator won't implement this feature label Feb 4, 2023
Haxxer added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 27, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request external help wanted Creator won't implement this feature
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants