Decide on "object" or "component", and use throughout

[emiltin]

Let's decide which terminlogy to use, and use it consistently.

[emiltin]

I think we can include this in 3.3?

[marcgarba]

We could have "Component Id" for RSMP core/messages (we have "cId" JSON tag to adress the component), actually used in majority cases.

And we could perhaps keep "object" (and "object type") for abstract part (with link for signals) if wanted (SCADA, objects, type of objects, ...)

In first terms, we have the definition to understand the link :
"An object is identified using component id. Please note that an object is not necessarily the same thing as an NTS object."

Enough?

[emiltin]

My suggestion was to use one or the the other throughout.