Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dante instead of Daemons? #46

Open
trans opened this issue Jun 13, 2012 · 1 comment
Open

Dante instead of Daemons? #46

trans opened this issue Jun 13, 2012 · 1 comment

Comments

@trans
Copy link
Member

trans commented Jun 13, 2012

If we do need a daemon executable, consider using Dante instead of Daemons. It's is simpler and can be easily incorporated into a customized executable. That way would we only need a single smeagol executable instead of both smeagol and smeagold.

@trans
Copy link
Member Author

trans commented Jul 21, 2012

I have now tried both daemons and dante gems, and haven't been able to get either to work. Obviously I am doing something wrong. So in this, I am hopeful someone else will have a look and see if they can get things in order.

On the other hand, I also wonder how important this is. In most cases, e.g. your typical hosting provider, they have their own means of daemonizing. We just need to provide the necessary setup, like a config.ru file. So maybe the daemon server isn't actually useful enough to support?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant