-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 78
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use LAPACK instead of LAPACKE #111
Comments
related to #74 |
A while ago, I worked on adding support for solving with 2-D
I came to the conclusion that the best thing to do is:
I'd also prefer using LAPACK over LAPACKE simply because the documentation is better. Regarding the implementation, a related issue is rust-ndarray/ndarray#390, although in my initial attempt at an implementation, I used a closure-based approach instead. |
It makes sense to me.
Anyway, we need fast transpose routine. |
AFAIK using LAPACK directly will also allow using Accelerate for |
Excuse me, but with this change, is macOS Accelerate usable as a backend to |
http://www.netlib.org/lapack/lapacke.html
I found while implementing rust-ndarray/ndarray#445 that the interface between CBLAS and LAPACKE around
UPLO
and other parameter are incompatible. I will use BLAS instead of CBLAS for it since the interface of BLAS is compatible with LAPACK (useu8
always). We should use LAPACK instead of LAPACKE (´・ω・`)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: