Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move the grid to a GDoc spreadsheet with fixed headers? #14

Open
jzaefferer opened this issue Jul 4, 2016 · 7 comments
Open

Move the grid to a GDoc spreadsheet with fixed headers? #14

jzaefferer opened this issue Jul 4, 2016 · 7 comments

Comments

@jzaefferer
Copy link

The grid is pretty difficult to read, since there's too many rows and columns, and it requires lots of scrolling to parse.

I wonder if this could work better as a GDoc spreadsheet, with both and header row and column on the left and top.

@rxaviers
Copy link
Owner

rxaviers commented Jul 4, 2016

Can't we solve this by changing the table layout somehow instead? I'd prefer to keep the content available as is (markdown via git repository) than to move it into a Google Docs spreadsheet.

A possible solution is to (i) transpose the table (functionalities vs. projects), then (ii) break the one big table into various smaller ones per major functionalities like date, number, ...

@jzaefferer
Copy link
Author

I don't know what you mean with "transpose the table". Maybe you could push a branch/PR with a sample change towards what you suggest?

@rxaviers
Copy link
Owner

rxaviers commented Jul 4, 2016

I don't know what you mean with "transpose the table". Maybe you could push a branch/PR with a sample change towards what you suggest?

Swap columns and rows :) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transpose

@jzaefferer
Copy link
Author

So you'd end up with multiple tables for each major feature with rows per framework, and a handful of columns for each relevant aspect of that feature?

@rxaviers
Copy link
Owner

rxaviers commented Jul 4, 2016

Yeap, what do you think? I'm definitely open for any other layout.

@jzaefferer
Copy link
Author

That seems good. Can't promise that I'll get around to implementing it though :/

@rxaviers
Copy link
Owner

rxaviers commented Jul 4, 2016

👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants