-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Usability] Lyrics support is unintuitive to use #111
Comments
This is the view inside an album after a song has been picked: How about we add option "Show lyrics" to the top pulley menu?
|
|
Heh, I see what I did there now that I read my message again. I wanted this to be a discussion, but I should have made the arguments more balanced. I could have mentioned, that adding the "Show lyrics" entry into top pulley menu means it has 4 items on it - that's the maximum, if the app is wanted to be used in landscape mode.
I wanted to hear opinions from other users and people who follow the discussion in this repo. As this is a community, I tend to think it as "we". I didn't want to make any demands or promises.
Good to hear that! And then to the questions...
Yes, that would be ideal.
Swiping from left (or to right) goes back to the song page that was opened by clicking the album cover. It sure would make more sense to go back to Album view page, if the "Show lyrics" top pulley menu item is used.
The logic needs to be changed to back to the previous page, which is either Album view page or Song view page. The Song view page has already 4 top pulley menu items, so I guess it could be kept as it is. |
To continue my bitching: Well, then discuss with yourself, until you know what you want to suggest. 😉 More seriously:
Well, I am aware of that more than four entries reduces usability in landscape orientation, though it is technically possible and basically still usable with five entries. But as there are currently three entries, this is a non-issue, right?
No:
I did not read your statement that way, you simply fully concealed who do you think of doing XYZ (here: implementing your suggestion) by using "we".
Good, but apparently not really "ideal", because …
… this would introduce an inconsistency.
By using such an pulley entry to open a QML-page …
… one automatically returns to the previous page when swiping sideways. But I currently do not understand the code of After thinking about it, I believe a single out of four pulley menu entries on the
As stated, five entries is also feasible, but three ways to reach the I originally thought I might be able to address this in a simple way with my little QML know-how, but after quickly looking at the code I doubt that. |
From #106 (comment) by @tuplasuhveli:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: