Debatable entries

[drdhaval2785]

Case 1

06084	123-22	<p> उडु	<p> उडु	<p> उडु	#-n.f.	$--1. A lunar mansion, a star, इंदुप्रकाशांतरितोडुतुल्याः /R./xvi.65; 2. water.	79
06085		<b> -उडुप, -उडूप	<b> उडु-उडुप, उडु-उडूप	<+> उडूडुप, उडूडूप	#-(I) m.n.	$--a raft or float, तितीर्षुर्दुस्तरं मोहादिडुपेनास्मि सागरम् /R./i.2.	70
06086					#-(II) m.	$--the moon.	12

I think the words are उडुप and उडूप only and not उडूडुप, उडूडूप.
What do others say? @Andhrabharati

[drdhaval2785]

Case 2

Unable to decipher the headword of the first entry.

[Andhrabharati]

I think the words are उडुप and उडूप only and not उडूडुप, उडूडूप.
What do others say? @Andhrabharati

You got the words right, @drdhaval2785 !

As I am looking at your LRV work in the past few days, I understand that my work in those early days (6 years back) of Devanagari treading is not that good; but I guess it had improved over next 2-3 years sufficiently.

[Andhrabharati]

Unable to decipher the headword of the first entry.

It is uravya (as per tradition, the vysya is born from the Uru of Brahma).

The index word on the top of the column shows the word clearer, though it is not that clear in the running text below.

[drdhaval2785]

It should have been ऊरव्य then. But it is shown as उरव्य

[drdhaval2785]

Case 3

A case in which there is clear print error. Entries of ऊर्ध्वक and ऊर्मि are erroneously combined.

See LRV

See AP90

[Andhrabharati]

It should have been ऊरव्य then. But it is shown as उरव्य

Right, probably we should take it as a print error.

[Andhrabharati]

A case in which there is clear print error. Entries of ऊर्ध्वक and ऊर्मि are erroneously combined.

Good catch!!

[drdhaval2785]

Case 4

Whether to change from कपित्थास्पद to कपित्थास्य based on other dictionaries?

LRV

AP90

MW

[drdhaval2785]

Case 5

10493	211-05	<p> कोला(लि, ली)	<p> कोला(लि, ली)	<p> कोला(लि, ली)	#-f.	$--See बदरी.	12

Not actually a question.
Just noting it here, because it gives errors due to difficulty in parsing.

[drdhaval2785]

Case 6

I am unaware about this grammatical rule. Can anyone shed some more light on how गूढ+आत्मन् becomes गूढोत्मन् ?

[Andhrabharati]

Could it be gUDhaH + Atman?

[Andhrabharati]

The above quote is from SiddhantaKaumudi (1034: 6-3-109).

[drdhaval2785]

Case 7

27564	528-13	<p> भिष्मटा, भिष्मिका, भिस्सटा, भिस्सिटा	<p> भिष्मटा, भिष्मिका, भिस्सटा, भिस्सिटा	<p> भिष्मटा, भिष्मिका, भिस्सटा, भिस्सिटा	#-f.	$--Parched grain.	17

I am not sure about भिष्मटा.

[Andhrabharati]

could it be changed as भिष्मिटा, as in Apte?

[drdhaval2785]

Case 8

Entry मंदसान has been erroneously entered inside मंदर by LRV

LRV

AP90

[drdhaval2785]

Case 9

विष्णुरिंगी 681-16
Should it be changed to विष्णुलिंगी to match with all other dictionaries?

[drdhaval2785]

Case 10

सप्ताश्ववाहन wrongly entered as सप्तात्मवाहन

LRV

AP

[gasyoun]

@drdhaval2785 corrrected and closable? @Andhrabharati nothing to be added?