-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
&c. Abbreviation #86
Comments
& is a symbolic representation of Latin 'et' ( English 'and'), similar to ॐ being a symbolic representation for Sanskrit 'om'. And it is noticed that at many places in the data this '&' is used instead of 'and' (which is the way the book has). All such need to be brought back to the 'book form' of 'and'. &c. is Latin 'et cetera', its English equivalent being 'and others'. |
This and other such composite words in Latin (like i.e., e.g., ...) could be expanded with both Latin forms and English forms, the present work being for English knowing people, who may or may not know Latin. It may be noted that all the (standard) present day English dictionaries give the expansion in English, for all such abbreviations. |
Agree. |
Had not realized it is not obvious. It's obviousness to me must be due to English as my home language. We can add the Where X could be 'and others' as AB suggests, or one of several other possibilities -- Not sure which is best.
|
”The world is full of obvious things which nobody ever observes,” says Sherlock Holmes
Let it be now.
Neither do I. So let's do what's clear. |
I think |
@funderburkjim as an unmarked abbreviation it is too big compare to other abbreviations. |
I agree that '&c.' is so common that it seems undesirable to add markup such as @Andhrabharati may find this suggestion insufficient. For instance if there are cases where the Cologne digitization has substituted '&c.' for the printed text 'and', then these differences would need to be changed in mw.txt. |
No, the printed word 'and' is typed just as &, not as &c. (so far as I saw) |
As you see he is fine. I'm not fine leaving as it is now. It is way too big now - because undermarked. |
Probably the &c. could be dealt the same way as etc. is dealt. (both being the same) |
&c.
is an abbreviation and not an obvious one. And not noted as such, @funderburkjimetcetera
?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: