-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
upasarga access #28
Comments
The 'alternate headword' solutionThe only solution thus far proposed is to treat all of these prefixed verbs similar to the way alternate headword spellings are treated. Take the AP90 dictionary as an example where we have implemented alternate headword access. An example is 'agatIka': If we did the same for prefixed verbs, then there would be many (maybe 50-100) duplications of the And, in the list display, there would be (in the left panel)
So this is one solution. What are other solutions? |
Sure, but let's try to learn from what's been done in the past. We have 10500 such sopasarga entries from MW (https://yadi.sk/i/G-dUimKVLDUhDA) and 3347 lines of Whitney Roots (http://yadi.sk/d/y9o_p8-lFvWbp).
prefixed verbs similar to the way alternate headword - I agree.
Better to see 100 prefixes (and there never are, see Whitney - only a few, including combinations of two, up to 20, rarely more) than to think (because they are not in search), that PWG left them out.
It is not obvious, that this is a web hint and not part of printed book. A popup or rather background color will do. |
This issue prompted by comment :
Take 'viS' (slp1) as example.
First - the prefixed verbs for viS in PWG have to be identified -- the first few are
and many more. Its a separate preliminary task to find all these. This task is non-trivial, but let's pretend we have all of the prefixed verbs in PWG under viS.
Exactly how should these be used?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: