Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

<ls>? -> <ls> #47

Open
funderburkjim opened this issue Jan 23, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

<ls>? -> <ls> #47

funderburkjim opened this issue Jan 23, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
bug

Comments

@funderburkjim
Copy link
Contributor

In some prior work with <ls> markup for pwg, I added a question mark: <ls>? . The thought at the time was that this would mark literary sources which needed further attention. However, this '?' is now believed to be not useful. Thus removing it.

This changes 8968 lines of pwg.txt.
funderburkjim added a commit to sanskrit-lexicon/csl-orig that referenced this issue Jan 23, 2022
@funderburkjim
PWG: <ls>? -> <ls>.
5225ee2 
Ref: sanskrit-lexicon/PWG#47
@gasyoun gasyoun added the bug label Jan 23, 2022
@Andhrabharati
Copy link

Isn't this issue closable, @funderburkjim ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bug
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@gasyoun @funderburkjim @Andhrabharati