-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Corrections in digitisation: Andhrabharati #13
Comments
As I had converted the SKD file to Devanagari and glanced through, found some errors in the word endings (given as alt. forms of HW entries in the book) The list is as under- Some of these are just one or two occurrences, and some run into few hundreds. As in any other dictionary, this SKD is also having multiple (grouped) words as HWs. |
@funderburkjim sounds like a batch correction for our master. |
I have resumed looking into SKD, with the latest file (now using Jim's transcoding). Corrected the file for the points (in 2 posts above ). Found that 4 metalines needed correction either in k1 or k2 fields. There are 354 entries where ka & k2 are not matching-- |
There are ~50 CDSL split L-entries, which are meant as variant 'group's by SKD compilers, marked with a flower (curly) bracket: 2369, 2370 These could be appropriately merged as single entries and kept as comma separated items in k2-field, as in some 'recent' works. [And, there are quite many more possible in this list-- due to some systematic differences (like with/without a terminating comma etc.)!!] |
Navigated through all the scan pages of SKD and noted the following: Tables : 18 Tables better rendered as pictures: 5 Pictures: 99 |
In comparison with the print, the CDSL file has
|
Did a parsing of the data and found some more corrections-- Addl. grouped entries Revised HW(s) Deleted HW(s) And this parsing facilitates better grasping of the structure of the work and yields many more "easy" corrections! |
By error, posted 2 posts in a 'wrong' issue-- |
Found 39 such HWs, with a plain pattern search. Probably a few more might be lying 'hidden' still. |
@Andhrabharati I like your comprehensive notes above. They will be helpful when revising the cdsl version. Hope you will continue these notes as your skd examination continues. @drdhaval2785 hope you will pay attention to AB's notes (You use SKD quite a bit, right?) |
@Andhrabharati : Have replaced pg3_021.pdf at Cologne, per img file above. Also replaced at https://github.com/sanskrit-lexicon-scans/SKD |
Now the list has another 8 added, this time 3 dhatus as well, of which one is a 'real' hiding entity. While these are all at the beginning of a new line in the print, the 'hidden' dhatu is merged with the previous entry as a running matter! @gasyoun , probably this is an interesting point for you!! |
Mismatched '[' and ']' cases
Opening '[' cases: 9 no.s
Line 42424: <>vfttiH .. [kAlaH . iti hemacandraH ..
The text after '[' belongs to the next entry (next line in print).
Line 54248: <>rAjanirGaRwaH .. [hemacandraH ..
The text after '[' belongs to the next entry (next line in print).
Line 63129: <>pAM 4 . 1 . 41 .) pippalI . SroRideSaH . [iti
The '[' is to be deleted here.
Line 92578: <>nAqIvraRaM vraRaM duzwamupadaMSaM vicarccikAm . [RAn .
The text after '[' belongs to the next line.
Line 106031: kzIRAzwakarmmA¦, [n) puM, (kzIRAni azwakarmmARi
Here the '[n)' is to be corrected as '[n]'.
Line 306359: bahvASI¦, [n) tri, (bahu aSnAtIti . bahu +
Here the '[n)' is to be corrected as '[n]'.
Line 507383: SrI¦, Ya ga pAke . iti kavikalpadrumaH .. [kryA0-
'[kryA0-' to be corrected as '(kryA0-'.
Line 507415: <>haraRam . “SrIste . [sAstAm ..”)
The '[' is to be deleted here.
Line 507429: <>mAlaSroH . [tasyAH sampUrRajAtiH . asyAH
The '[' is to be deleted here.
-----------------
Closing ']' cases: 5 no.s
Line 105215: kzarI¦, (n] (kzaraH kzaraRaM varzaRaM astvasmin kAle
Here the '(n]' is to be corrected as '[n]'.
Line 117098: <>13 . 17 . 79 .skd2-298-b+ 52]
.skd2-298-b+ 52] to be corrected as . [Page2-298-b+ 52].
Line 306359: bahvASI¦, [n) tri, (bahu aSnAtIti . bahu +
Here the '(n]' is to be corrected as '[n]'.
Line 508964: <>DaraH .. (yaTA, mAGe . 7 . 62 .]
The ']' is to be deleted here.
Line 578433: hUravaH¦, puM, (hU iti ravo'sya .] SfgAlaH . iti
Here the ']' is to be corrected as ')'.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: