aNgirAuvAca

[drdhaval2785]

Wrong marking as headword in the printed text itself.
In L-number addition, care has been taken to remove it from the headword list.
But in the text, it still has a broken bar <>aNgirAuvAca¦
@funderburkjim may like to clarify.

https://www.sanskrit-lexicon.uni-koeln.de/scans/csl-apidev/servepdf.php?dict=vcp&page=0051

[Page0051-a+ 38]
<>Kyeti” jyotizam . (analaH kfttikA) evaM yaTAyaTamudA-
<>hAryyam .
<>agnyaBimAninaSca devAH kuta utpannAH? kasmin kasmin .
<>karmmaRi? vA tezAmaDizWAtftvaM taduktaM BArate .
<>aNgirAuvAca¦ kuru puRyaM prajAsargaM BavAgnistimirApahaH . mAYca
<>deva! kfruzvAgne! praTamaM puttramaYjasA .. tacCrutvA'Ngiraso vAkyaM

[drdhaval2785]

Total 12 such irregular cases in vcp.txt.

<>aNgirAuvAca¦ kuru puRyaM prajAsargaM BavAgnistimirApahaH . mAYca
<>aTa¦ mArge meDiropaRam “kftvA tu KalakaM mArge samaM goma-
<>lANgalaM¦ tat pravakzyAmi yatkAzWaM yatpramARataH . halISAyA-
<>kapAlaketuH¦ “aTAdityajAnAM kapAlaketurudayate amA-
<>calaketuH¦ “aTa pEtAmahaScalaketuH paYcadaSavarzaSataM prozya uditaH
<>uddAlakaSvetaketuH¦ gfhaketuSca “aToddAlakaH SvetaketurddaSI-
<>raSmiketuH¦ “aTa raSmiketurviBAvasujaH prozya varzaSatamAva-
<>jalaketuH¦ “aTa jalaketuH pEtAmahaH yaSca calaketornavamAsAva-
<>BavaketuH¦ “aTa jalaketoH karmmasamAptO DUmrAdayaH SItAntAHazwO
<>AvarttaketuH¦ “aTAvarttaketuH SvetaketoH karmmaRyatIte'pa-
<>aTArGaM¦ saMpravakzyAmi yadukta cAdijAmale . ekASIti
<>varjyasevye¦ “atyAhAraH prayAsaSca prajalpo niyamAgrahaH .

[Andhrabharati]

These are the cases of someone telling something.

At most of such places, I have changed ¦ to a colon, which is the way it is normally marked in the prints or deleted it, as appropriate [while I was on VCP few months back, Apr 21?]

[Andhrabharati]

Wrong marking as headword in the printed text itself.

I would say this is a bad remark.

It is not printed as a headword (in bold) in the print; but is just somewhat offset to left (as a new paragraph indication).
There are quite many places like this in the whole book.