You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A look above and below the entry aBiraMj shows that actually, there should have been mention of Verb class and pada just after the headword instead of passive.
I am not sure though.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
ap90.txt:223971: {#viSF#}¦ {%<ab>Pass.</ab>%} {@1@} To be split in
ap90.txt:228915: {#vyatiric#}¦ {%<ab>Pass.</ab>%} {@1@} To differ or be
ap90.txt:241129: {#saMsaMj#}¦ {%<ab>Pass.</ab>%} To be attached or
Found 3 matches for "¦ {%<ab>Pass.</ab>%}".
For aBiraMj, the absence of class-pada seems intentional. Same absence occurs in aBiraYj in AP57.
The use of 'Pass.' sometimes and 'pass.' other times is just an internal inconsistency.
Both should be marked as abbreviations <ab>pass.</ab> and <ab>Pass.</ab>, and
There should be abbreviation tooltips for both. Added missing tooltip for Pass. in csl-pywork.
Would be good to check for incompleteness in either markup or tooltip due to capitalization differences.
A look above and below the entry aBiraMj shows that actually, there should have been mention of Verb class and pada just after the headword instead of passive.
I am not sure though.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: