Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AP90 - single entry of ¦ {%<ab>pass.</ab>%} #692

Open
drdhaval2785 opened this issue Oct 8, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

AP90 - single entry of ¦ {%<ab>pass.</ab>%} #692

drdhaval2785 opened this issue Oct 8, 2021 · 2 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@drdhaval2785
Copy link
Collaborator

A look above and below the entry aBiraMj shows that actually, there should have been mention of Verb class and pada just after the headword instead of passive.
I am not sure though.
image

@drdhaval2785
Copy link
Collaborator Author

There are three more with capital P.

ap90.txt:223971: {#viSF#}¦ {%<ab>Pass.</ab>%} {@1@} To be split in
ap90.txt:228915: {#vyatiric#}¦ {%<ab>Pass.</ab>%} {@1@} To differ or be
ap90.txt:241129: {#saMsaMj#}¦ {%<ab>Pass.</ab>%} To be attached or
Found 3 matches for "¦ {%<ab>Pass.</ab>%}".

@drdhaval2785 drdhaval2785 added the question Further information is requested label Oct 8, 2021
@funderburkjim
Copy link
Contributor

For aBiraMj, the absence of class-pada seems intentional. Same absence occurs in aBiraYj in AP57.

The use of 'Pass.' sometimes and 'pass.' other times is just an internal inconsistency.

Both should be marked as abbreviations <ab>pass.</ab> and <ab>Pass.</ab>, and
There should be abbreviation tooltips for both. Added missing tooltip for Pass. in csl-pywork.

Would be good to check for incompleteness in either markup or tooltip due to capitalization differences.

funderburkjim added a commit to sanskrit-lexicon/csl-pywork that referenced this issue Dec 21, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants