New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

MW: inadequacy of 'prec.' (preceding) #852

Open

funderburkjim opened this issue Apr 27, 2022 · 0 comments

Labels

Contributor

funderburkjim commented Apr 27, 2022

A user mentioned this deficiency in #774.

The point is that 'prec.' would be more helpful if the actual reference word was included.

There is similar obscurity (which has been noticed by various users) with 'id.' and 'ibid.'

funderburkjim added the enhancement label

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment