Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Full algorithm description? #119

Open
stanleyjs opened this issue Sep 16, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Full algorithm description? #119

stanleyjs opened this issue Sep 16, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@stanleyjs
Copy link

stanleyjs commented Sep 16, 2022

Hello,

I am attempting to understand your approach to reference mapping. I notice that at some point in your method, you are using SCTransform to compute Pearson residuals on a subset of the genes.
The reference I am using is https://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(21)00583-3.

While in the discussion of WNN for multimodal graph construction there is a brief reference to SCtransform, the Azimuth-specific methods (or citations within) do not appear to reference Pearson residuals. Therefore, it is unclear to me why and how SCT is being used. Is the SCT normalized output the input to sPCA? Are the same variable genes used from the reference as in the query?

Can you please provide a link to a complete description of Azimuth?

@AustinHartman
Copy link
Contributor

Each Azimuth reference contains an SCTransform model to compute pearson residuals for a subset of genes identified as variable. When a query is annotated the first thing that happens is the reference SCTransform model is used to compute pearson residuals of the query counts on the subset of variable genes. After that, the pearson residuals in the query are used to project the query cells into the same low-dimensional PCA space as the reference

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants