Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use AWS open data source from ASF #63

Open
scottstanie opened this issue Aug 15, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Use AWS open data source from ASF #63

scottstanie opened this issue Aug 15, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@scottstanie
Copy link
Owner

Nice news from ASF, which means we should switch over the source and set this as the default:

ASF has made Sentinel-1 orbits available in Amazon S3 and the https://registry.opendata.aws/s1-orbits/. The main advantages of the new archive are 1) files are publicly accessible without authentication, and 2) it's built for high availability using AWS infrastructure...our archive at https://s1qc.asf.alaska.edu is still available and still supported

Our https://s1-orbits.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/README.html has the details, including some small tools we built to make finding the orbit you need easier. In particular, we published an https://pypi.org/project/s1-orbits/ python library for our most common use case

@cmarshak
Copy link

@dbekaert 👆

@cmarshak
Copy link

cmarshak commented Sep 16, 2024

Just as an aside, I am very partial to the API design - well the SLC input as I am not as well versed in S1 metadata - might be nice to add this as well i.e. fetch_orbit(<SLC_ID>)

@scottstanie
Copy link
Owner Author

do you mean just the naming fetch_orbits vs download_eofs? or as a positional argument?
there is the option for sentinel_file for download_orbits now which would work with any string that parses to a granule correctly

@cmarshak
Copy link

sentinel_file solves that - thanks for sharing!

scottstanie added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants