Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Do development on architectury #8

Open
PalTheTaur opened this issue Jul 15, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Do development on architectury #8

PalTheTaur opened this issue Jul 15, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@PalTheTaur
Copy link

I saw you label someone mention forge as an enhancement, and I was able to get it running under forge 1.18.2 using architectury pretty easily. Though my forge port sucks cus I didn't lay it out to actually support forge and fabric, only used it as an easy translation layer. But most of your stuff can exist inside the common area, the only things I had to make outside of common was the getPath(), DedicatedServerWatchdogMixin, and how the on tick was hooked up.

I just like this because some modpacks are just built wacky and run poorly, this makes it a lot better to deal with. Cool mod overall.

@TreeOfSelf
Copy link

All the Forge people running 800,000 poorly optimized mods smashed together into a 700gb ram-consuming 4 TPS pack are frothing at the mouth looking at this.

@JXSnack
Copy link
Member

JXSnack commented Jul 15, 2024

Heyho! Yes - architectury is probably going to be used, but I'll first need to learn it and get it to work with Stonecutter (the current system I use to make this run on more versions). This will definitely take a while, so don't get your hopes up that it'll happen very soon.

This is on my todo list, but not at the highest priority

@JXSnack JXSnack added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants