You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have a question on how sensitivity is calculated in the SCOPe benchmark. In particular, it is on the total number of positives for the different cases: family, super-family, and fold.
In the evaluation script, I understand that famCnt[id2fam[i]] - 1 removes the self-comparison.
I think the discrepancy comes from subtracting (famCnt['b.52.2.2'] - 1)) that should be only famCnt['b.52.2.2'] since self hit is already excluded in sfamCnt['b.52.2'].
This results in none of the methods evaluated having queries with 100% sensitivity for super-family and fold.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I have a question on how sensitivity is calculated in the SCOPe benchmark. In particular, it is on the total number of positives for the different cases: family, super-family, and fold.
In the evaluation script, I understand that
famCnt[id2fam[i]] - 1
removes the self-comparison.foldseek-analysis/scopbenchmark/scripts/bench.noselfhit.awk
Line 25 in 1737c71
However, in the super-family and fold cases, subtracting
(famCnt[id2fam[i]] - 1)
includes the self-comparison in the total count.foldseek-analysis/scopbenchmark/scripts/bench.noselfhit.awk
Line 26 in 1737c71
For example, given the SCOPe domain
d1eu1a1 b.52.2.2
, there are 9 other domains with the same class (including itself)then,
famCnt['b.52.2.2'] - 1 = 8
If we now consider the super-family case, i.e., domains in the same super-family but not the same family we found 7 domains
the total number of domains for the super-family
b.52.2
is 16grep b.52.2 scop.tsv | wc -l 16
and thus,
(sfamCnt['b.52.2'] - (famCnt['b.52.2.2'] - 1)) = 8
I think the discrepancy comes from subtracting
(famCnt['b.52.2.2'] - 1))
that should be onlyfamCnt['b.52.2.2']
since self hit is already excluded insfamCnt['b.52.2']
.This results in none of the methods evaluated having queries with 100% sensitivity for super-family and fold.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: