diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 61cdc1b1..c9a16bdf 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -56,8 +56,13 @@ Chinese translations for classic IT resources. ------------------ 1. [关于`Java`你可能不知道的10件事](10-things-you-didnt-know-about-java/README.md) -你是不是写`Java`已经有些年头了？还依稀记得这些吧： -那些年，它还叫做`Oak`；那些年，`OO`还是个热门话题；那些年，`C++`同学们觉得`Java`是没有出路的；那些年，`Applet`还风头正劲…… 但我打赌下面的这些事中至少有一半你还不知道。 +作者是个`Java`老鸟，行文风趣幽默，娓娓道出`Java`的诡异和难点时不忘着给出用心良苦的提点。 + +软件测试 +------------------ + +- [`Stubs`和`Mocks`的区别](stubs-vs-mocks/README.md) +翻译自《Programming Groovy》，讲得言简意赅。 `Lisp` ------------------ diff --git a/stubs-vs-mocks/README.md b/stubs-vs-mocks/README.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..b007e8c0 --- /dev/null +++ b/stubs-vs-mocks/README.md @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@ +翻译自《Programming Groovy － Dynamic Productivity for the jdk Developer》的P243。 +译文发在：[`Stubs`和`Mocks`的区别](http://oldratlee.com/76/tech/java/stubs-vs-mocks.html)，2010-09-23 / [`Stubs`和`Mocks`的区别](http://blog.csdn.net/oldrat/archive/2010/03/09/5359198.aspx)，2010-03-09。 + +翻译自《Programming Groovy － Dynamic Productivity for the jdk Developer》的P243，讲得言简意赅，值得翻译出来理解。 + +`Stubs`和`Mocks`的区别 +====================== + +在文章[『`Mocks`不是`Stubs`』](http://martinfowler.com/articles/mocksArentStubs.html)，马丁·福勒讨论了`stubs`和`mocks`之间的区别。 + +`stub`代表的是一个真实的对象。在测试代码中被调用时，它简单地按照之前对它训练的设定来应答调用者。对`stub`应答的设定是为了通过测试。 + +`mock`对象要比`stub`做的事情多得多： + +- 帮你确定你的代码和它的依赖（称为合作者`collaborator`）有你期望的交互。 +- 跟踪你的在`mock`对象代表的合作者执行调用的序列和次数。 +- 保证方法调用传递了合适的参数。 + +`stubs`只检查的是状态（`state`），而`mocks`检查了行为（`behavior`）。在测试中使用`mock`，不仅检查你测试和其依赖之间和状态，而且还有行为。 + +> 原文如下： +> +> Stubs vs. Mocks +> +> In the article “Mocks Aren’t Stubs,” (), +> Martin Fowler discusses the difference between stubs and mocks. A stub stands in for a real object. +> It simply reciprocates the coached expected response when called by the code being tested. +> The response is set up to satisfy the needs for the test to pass. +> A mock object does a lot more than a stub. +> It helps you ensure your code is interacting with its dependencies, the collaborators, as expected. +> It can keep track of the sequence and number of calls your code makes on the collaborator it stands in for. +> It ensures proper parameters are passed in to method calls. +> While stubs verify state, mocks verify behavior. +> When you use a mock in your test, it verifies not only the state but also the behavior of the interaction of your code with its dependencies. +> Groovy provides support for creating both stubs and mocks, as you will see in Section 16.10, Mocking Using the Groovy Mock Library, on page 254. + +PS +============= + +顺便推荐一下[《Programming Groovy 2 － Dynamic Productivity for the jdk Developer》](https://book.douban.com/subject/22170571/)这本书。 + +这是一本`Groovy`进阶的书，入门可以先看一下[《Groovy Recipes －Greasing the Wheels of jdk》](https://book.douban.com/subject/2584518/)或是[《Groovy Programming －An Introduction for jdk Developers》](https://book.douban.com/subject/1969390/)。`Groovy`的学习资料的介绍可以参见：。 + +《Programming Groovy 2》中有关的**_元编程_**的讲解应该是最全面的。更好的是，对动态语言的编程的最佳实践也讲了很多。 + +相关资料 +============= + +- [Mocks Aren’t Stubs](http://martinfowler.com/articles/mocksArentStubs.html) + [Mock并非Stub（翻译）](http://www.predatorray.me/Mock%E5%B9%B6%E9%9D%9EStub-%E7%BF%BB%E8%AF%91/) +- 测试相关书籍 + - [《测试驱动开发》](https://book.douban.com/subject/1230036/) + - [《JUnit实战(第2版)》](https://book.douban.com/subject/10561424/) + - [《测试驱动的面向对象软件开发》](https://book.douban.com/subject/4910582/)