From aa741be2dac1f6dfe189b558f5dbcb68ab9d71b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Laisky.Cai" Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 16:00:55 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] Update send.mdx Use `forward_fee` instead of `forward - fee` to reduce ambiguity. --- pages/book/send.mdx | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/pages/book/send.mdx b/pages/book/send.mdx index b321d082..f7ef12e4 100644 --- a/pages/book/send.mdx +++ b/pages/book/send.mdx @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ There, the second message won't actually be sent: * After finishing the [compute phase][compute], the remaining value $\mathrm{R}$ of the contract is computed. -* During the outbound message processing and assuming that there was enough value provided in the inbound message, the first message leaves $\mathrm{R} - (0.042 + \mathrm{forward-fees})$ [nanoToncoins](/book/integers#nanotoncoin) on the balance. +* During the outbound message processing and assuming that there was enough value provided in the inbound message, the first message leaves $\mathrm{R} - (0.042 + \mathrm{forward\_fees})$ [nanoToncoins](/book/integers#nanotoncoin) on the balance. * When the second message is processed, contract tries to send $\mathrm{R}$ [nanoToncoins](/book/integers#nanotoncoin), but fails to do so because there is already a smaller amount left.