Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

100% Open Source #3

Open
sirinath opened this issue Apr 22, 2021 · 6 comments
Open

100% Open Source #3

sirinath opened this issue Apr 22, 2021 · 6 comments

Comments

@sirinath
Copy link

Can you got for an 100% open source model with monetisation for:

  • support and consultancy
  • sponsored prioritisation of feature and bugs
  • managed hosting
  • training and certification
  • etc.
@jinmingjian
Copy link
Contributor

Good ideas. The future of this frontier edition is still in thinking. Personally, I hope two: 1. the tech progress of can benefit all individual; and 2. Business loop with monetisation works. 100% is possible. Although this is not a main stream state: no 100% in this field like Databricks, or non-commercial-friendly license, like Materialize.

@sirinath
Copy link
Author

Main thing is financial sustainability. Early on try to get cooperate sponsors with them also using it. Companies like https://wso2.com/ does 100% open source and also monetise their products.

@jinmingjian
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for information. You said WSO2 uses its own WSO2 Software License. This is a good example.

@sirinath
Copy link
Author

This is for enterprise channel updates and support. But all the products are also licensed under AL 2.0 and 100% open source.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WSO2

WSO2 products are released under the Apache License Version 2. Like the Apache project itself, WSO2 follows open development principles and publishes architecture and development discussions.

@jinmingjian
Copy link
Contributor

@sirinath thanks for more infos:) I am a little confused herer 100% open source vs 100% AL 2.0 open source. A question: why enterprise channel updates and support have a dedicated license if they are the same thing?

If its enterprise channel has more closed-source features that AL2.0 does not have, then this is an "open core" model. Most open source company uses this model, for example, DataBricks behind Spark.

If its enterprise channel has more non-commercial open-source licensed features that AL2.0 does not have, then this is an model like Materialize.

If its enterprise channel == AL2.0 software + non-softare service and it has a positive profit, then it may be an very interesting case.

@sirinath
Copy link
Author

sirinath commented Apr 23, 2021

There is no difference between the products. Enterprise has more convenient builds and updates delivered through an update software which I believe is also fully open source. I think some builds and update are only accessible to customers through the source code is available under AL 2.0. Also the support contacts gives additional support guarantees and warranties not found in AL 2.0.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants