-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 471
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
MAST returns natural log, not log2FC #20
Comments
Hey! Thanks for the update. I do have a plot that assumes they are log2 FC values. Tbh, I don't think it changes the results though. The only difference is a scaling factor on the logFC values... in the notebook the absolute values don't really matter. I will adapt this though! |
will reopen this for now until it is fixed. |
Updated in #58 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I have recently checked with the MAST developers what log basis they use to report logfoldchanges in MAST because I could not find that information anywhere. (RGLab/MAST#112)
Turns out that given we provide (natural)log-normalised as an input to mast, the reported logfoldchanges are also on a natural log basis. I.e. they need to be devided by ln(2) to become log2FC.
I guess this will also be important to how you use those values in the notebook as well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: