-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Should the trans
argument in scale_*_continuous
etc be renamed to transform
?
#5558
Comments
I'm not sure whether that kerfuffle associated with changing argument names is worth the small increase in consistency. |
There must have been a reason for using Presumably the same reason holds? Consistency makes things easier |
I'll ask @thomasp85 to weigh in on this decision |
I'm not sure about the details, but the NEWS says:
Regarding tab-completion, I don't see any benefit in ggplot2's case. |
The main reason for the scales change was indeed to streamline the naming conventions in the package to have the common name in front to make tab-completion easier. However, as we were already renaming things we decided to also use a more descriptive and inclusive naming. Let's keep this open but it is unlikely to be included in the upcoming release |
I like the trans argument name 🏳️⚧️ |
Just curious, should |
I like the consistency argument, and I think in a perfect world that would be ideal. However, spending some time with untangling the latest reverse depency checks, I am usure we should even rename the |
Thanks. I have no intention to push |
Given that the scales functions will be changing from
scales::*_trans
toscales::transform_*
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: