Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Use .dsection rather than .include? #11

Open
tom-seddon opened this issue Nov 3, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Use .dsection rather than .include? #11

tom-seddon opened this issue Nov 3, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@tom-seddon
Copy link
Owner

Might be a bit nicer. Try it and see.
@tom-seddon
Copy link
Owner Author

This does work OK, but the section appears out of order - the code is listed at the point of the .section rather than the .dsection. So not so good without post-processing the .lst file!

Worth doing in the long run as it's a lot easier having everything in one file.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@tom-seddon