Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Data completeness checks #54

Open
10 of 23 tasks
nickrsan opened this issue Jun 6, 2016 · 2 comments
Open
10 of 23 tasks

Data completeness checks #54

nickrsan opened this issue Jun 6, 2016 · 2 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@nickrsan
Copy link
Member

nickrsan commented Jun 6, 2016

Checking to make sure floodplains are completely covering the area

  • niobrara - northern river and reservation generated
  • pattonsburg - missing top portion and needs recheck after DEM fix
  • rhineland (needs recheck after DEM fix)
  • shawneetown - right side missing and needs recheck after DEM fix
  • silex (needs recheck after DEM fix)
  • soldiers grove
  • gays mills (missing right side))
  • english
  • leavenworth
  • odanah
  • valmeyer - floodplain digitized!!!
  • Remove Area Not included polygons from NFHL

Check data coordinate systems to ensure consistency and no weird behavior

  • niobrara
  • pattonsburg
  • rhineland
  • shawneetown
  • silex
  • soldiers grove
  • gays mills
  • english
  • leavenworth
  • odanah
  • valmeyer
@nickrsan nickrsan changed the title Floodplain completeness checks Data completeness checks Jun 6, 2016
@nickrsan
Copy link
Member Author

nickrsan commented Jun 7, 2016

Odanah floodplain needed to be rebuilt to better cover whole area. Maybe still inconsistent with NFHL, but better than before

@nickrsan nickrsan self-assigned this Jun 7, 2016
@nickrsan nickrsan added this to the final_model milestone Jun 7, 2016
@nickrsan
Copy link
Member Author

In case it's not clear, Odanah floodplain is good now

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant