You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
macOS BigSur (version 11.4), AccessMod docker version 5.7.10 alpha
When running geocoverage module with a very high capacity (in this case 1million, effectively outputting catchment results that never reach the max cap), the travel time catchments stop computing before reaching the assigned max travel time (in this case 60 minutes), thus outputting figures lower than 60 minutes in the "amTravelTimeCatchment" column.
However, when running the same analysis with the "run analysis without considering capacities" toggle enabled, the issue no longer arises, all catchments are calculated up to 60 minutes.
What I have discovered is that both analyses output the same statistical results. The shape vector files are slighlty different in between the two, the analyses without considering capacities outputs slightly larger catchments (related to the fact that the computation stops at 60 minutes, and not a few minutes before).
Expected Behavior
Both aforementioned analyses should output the exact same results and compute up to the maximum travel time assigned by the user
Possible Solution
No idea...
Steps to Reproduce
I have put the necessary materials (and screenshots of the parameter setup) in the dedicated dropbox folder
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Current Behavior
macOS BigSur (version 11.4), AccessMod docker version 5.7.10 alpha
When running geocoverage module with a very high capacity (in this case 1million, effectively outputting catchment results that never reach the max cap), the travel time catchments stop computing before reaching the assigned max travel time (in this case 60 minutes), thus outputting figures lower than 60 minutes in the "amTravelTimeCatchment" column.
However, when running the same analysis with the "run analysis without considering capacities" toggle enabled, the issue no longer arises, all catchments are calculated up to 60 minutes.
What I have discovered is that both analyses output the same statistical results. The shape vector files are slighlty different in between the two, the analyses without considering capacities outputs slightly larger catchments (related to the fact that the computation stops at 60 minutes, and not a few minutes before).
Expected Behavior
Both aforementioned analyses should output the exact same results and compute up to the maximum travel time assigned by the user
Possible Solution
No idea...
Steps to Reproduce
I have put the necessary materials (and screenshots of the parameter setup) in the dedicated dropbox folder
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: