Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Feature Request] queuing transfers #132

Open
0-wiz-0 opened this issue Nov 10, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

[Feature Request] queuing transfers #132

0-wiz-0 opened this issue Nov 10, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
backlog Implementation/fix not planned yet new feature New feature or request
Milestone
0.17.0

Comments

@0-wiz-0
Copy link

0-wiz-0 commented Nov 10, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Description

It would be good to add queuing support, i.e. the user can mark a list of files to transfer one way or the other and then, when finished, start all the transfers.

Changes

The following changes to the application are expected

  • add a new command to add files to the transfer list
  • add a new command to remove files from the transfer list
  • perhaps add a new view that shows the transfer list
  • add a new command to start the actual transfer
@0-wiz-0 0-wiz-0 changed the title feature request: queuing transfers [Feature Request] queuing transfers Nov 10, 2022
@veeso veeso added new feature New feature or request backlog Implementation/fix not planned yet labels Feb 10, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale issue closed due to inactivity label May 23, 2023
@veeso veeso removed the stale issue closed due to inactivity label May 23, 2023
Repository owner deleted a comment from github-actions bot Oct 3, 2024
@veeso veeso added this to the 0.16.0 milestone Oct 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
backlog Implementation/fix not planned yet new feature New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
0.17.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@0-wiz-0 @veeso