You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was asked whether it was spec'd anywhere what should happen for if an accessible name changes. I pointed to this spec since the name change (and description change) events are talked about here... but apparently I misremembered how detailed they were/weren't spec'd.
Looking at this more, one could argue that core aam actually only says a name or description change event SHOULD occur for if an aria-label/labelledby or aria-describedby/description are changed.... but not necessarily if other naming mechanisms (from content, or from title attribute) are changed.
Does this need to be clarified here? Does it need to be called out in accName or the other host-language AAMs? Should this really be just a 'should', re:
Clarification would be good. Taking this multi-function button demo as an example, it uses a hidden live region to announce the change in accessible name. Testing with VoiceOver, Edge and Firefox announce both the change in accessible name and the live region, resulting in a double announcement (Preparing Preparing, Yay Sandwich Yay Sandwich), whereas Safari only announces the live region.
I was asked whether it was spec'd anywhere what should happen for if an accessible name changes. I pointed to this spec since the name change (and description change) events are talked about here... but apparently I misremembered how detailed they were/weren't spec'd.
Looking at this more, one could argue that core aam actually only says a name or description change event SHOULD occur for if an aria-label/labelledby or aria-describedby/description are changed.... but not necessarily if other naming mechanisms (from content, or from title attribute) are changed.
Does this need to be clarified here? Does it need to be called out in accName or the other host-language AAMs? Should this really be just a 'should', re:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: